Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
SANTOSH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. storage of rice for pds was improperly investigated. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. invalidity of case registration under e.c. act. (Para 5) |
| 3. no substantive evidence proving intent for pds. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. quashing of proceedings upheld due to lack of authority. (Para 9) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) Heard Sri. B. Anwar Basha., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Jayaram Siddi., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 – State.
2. The petitioner – accused has filed this petition under Section 4 82 of Cr.P.C., [582 of BNSS, 2023], praying to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.372/2023, on the file of learned Civil Judge and JMFC, Harapanahalli in connection with Harapanahalli Police Station Crime No.0154/2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 7 , 3, 6(A) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 , Sections 4 , 8, 3(2)(i) of Karnataka Essential Commodities (Storage Accounts Maintaining Value Notification) Order, 1981, Sections 3 , 4, 12, 18, 19 of Karnataka Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Public Control Order, 2016 and Section 4 20 of Indian Penal Code .
3. Brief facts of the prosecution c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
