Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
VENKATESH NAIK T, J
ULHAS S/O. RAJANIKANTH DODDAMANI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. joint compromise reached. (Para 3) |
| 2. settlement deemed significant, quashing trial. (Para 7) |
| 3. court's authority to prevent misuse of legal processes. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) Heard Smt. Anusha Sangami., learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Jairam Siddi., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1 – State and Sri. Ganesh S.Jithuri., learned counsel for respondent No.2.
The petitioner and the de facto complainant are present.
2. The petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 4 have filed the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [Section 482 of Cr.P.C], seeking to quash the entire proceedings in Crime No.98/2025 of Vidyanagar Police Station, Hubballi- Dharwad City for offence punishable under Section 106 (1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending on the file of 1st Additional Civil Judge and JMFC (Jr.Dn), Hubballi. Now, the petitioners and the de facto complainant have resolved their disputes with the intervention of elders and well-wishers from both families.
3. In view of settlement, the petitioners and respondent No.2 have filed a joint memo under Section 359
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
