Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA, J
SMT. N SUNITHA D/O LATE NAGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SMT SHIVAMMA W/O LATE NAGAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay citing health and economic reasons. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contentions from the opposing side regarding the delay. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's emphasis on finality and need for sufficient cause. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. ruling on the insufficiency of provided reasons for delay. (Para 10) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. Amith Xavier C., learned counsel for the appellants and Sri. Rajadithya Sadasivan, learned counsel for the contesting respondent No.4, on I.A.No.1/2021. 2. There is a delay of 1595 days in filing the appeal.
An application is filed seeking condonation of said delay vide I.A.No.1/2021 supported by an affidavit of Smt. N. Sunitha, who is the first appellant.
3. In the affidavit in paragraphs 3 and 4, it has been stated as under:
"3. I state that, I was not keeping well for the past several years and also suffering from chronic disease, sugar, lower BP and also I have no other means of income except depending daily wages and earnings from household work and agricultural work, and I come from a economically weaker section and caste (Kumbara Jaathi) since from the time of passing the judgment by the Lower Appellate Court in R.A.No.3/2025 on the fi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
