KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V SRISHANANDA, J
SRI. M. C. KUBERAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. PARVATHAMMA U. M. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in appeal requires substantial justification. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court found lack of merit and procedural compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. Jagan Mohan M.T., learned counsel for the appellant and Sri. Ravi J.S., learned counsel for the respondent.
2. In all these three appeals, there is a delay of
459 days in filing the appeal. Reasons assigned by the appellant for condonation of delay is that appellant was suffering from ill-health and had financial difficulty. He RSA No. 459 of 2025 HC-KAR could not arrange court fee in a sum of Rs.60,575/- in respect of all the three appeals and therefore delay needs to be condoned.
3. To support the contentions urged in the affidavit with regard to the illnesses is concerned, there is no material produced as to what was the type of illness that the appellant suffered which prevented him from approaching this Court in time.
4. No medical certificate, nor the doctor's advice, nor prescription having taken the medicines for the alleged illness is annexed along with the affidavit to substantiate the contentions urged in the affidavit.
5. Further, insofar as financial difficulty is concerned, in view of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.