Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Shivashankar Amarannavar, JJ
Dakhya Naik – Appellant
Versus
Sri Javarappa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition context and background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the unreasonableness of delay. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's determination of review petition maintainability. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. ratio concerning the time limitation under ptcl act. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. conclusion and order regarding review. (Para 19) |
CAV ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV and HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR)
1. This review petition is filed by petitioners (respondent Nos. 3-(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) in W.A. No. 898/1993) seeking review of judgment dated 23.04.2021 passed in W.A. No. 898/1993 and consequently to hear and dispose of W.A. No. 898/1993 afresh.
2. The gist of petitioner’s case is that, the land bearing survey No. 20/6 in Block No. 6 of Mosarahalli Village, Bhadravati taluk, measuring 3 acres was granted in favour of one Sri. Dakya Naika, son of Sri. Dodda Dharma Naika on 16.06.1957 under Darkasth Rules. It was indicated thereunder that non-alienation period is 15 years. Grantee sold the entire extent of 3 acres under a registered sale deed dated 20.03.1963 in favour of Smt. Krishna Bai and she in turn sold 1 acre out of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
