Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
SMT. SHREYA S. PAI @ CHANDRIKA KAMAT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of complaints and counter complaints. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on abuse of process of law. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's detailed observations on allegations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. legal reasoning for quashing firs. (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
CAV ORDER
In the course of this order, for the sake of convenience, the petitioner in Writ Petition No.28591 of 2023 who is the husband of the complainant will be referred to as the petitioner or THE husband and the 1st petitioner in Writ Petition No.3809 of 2024 who is the wife of the petitioner in the companion petition will be referred to as the respondent or the wife. The other parties will be referred as per their rank in the writ petitions. These petitions arise out of complaints and counter complaints between the petitioner/husband and the respondent/wife, details of which are narrated hereinbelow.
2. Facts in Writ Petition No.28591 of 2023: The petitioner/husband and the respondent/wife get married on 10-05-2007. Two children are born from the wedlock, a son and a daughter on 11-12-2011 and 02-05-2013. It is the case of the prosecution that on 28-04-2016 the husband re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
