Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P. SANDESH, J
UMA ABHILASHA IYER – Appellant
Versus
V. JANARDHAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal revision petitions filed under section 397 of cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. facts underpinning claims of dishonored cheque. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for enhancing compensation in revision petition. (Para 7) |
| 4. arguments raised by the accused contesting conviction. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. respondent's counter-arguments focused on cheque issuance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. court's examination of evidence and admissions regarding the cheque. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. court's analysis of appeals and maintainability. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. discussion on legal provisions regarding revision and appeal. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. assessing complainant's rights under cr.p.c. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 10. court's interpretation of compensation under ni act. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 29) |
| 11. analysis of the parameters for enhancing fine under section 138. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 12. order allowing complainant's petition for enhanced compensation. (Para 34) |
CAV ORDER
2. The parties are referred to in the name of complainant and accused for the sake of brevity and convenience of the Court.
4. The complainant filed the complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. alleging that the accused person has committed an offe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
