Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Mrs. Anu Sivaraman, Mr. Umesh M Adiga, JJ
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB) – Appellant
Versus
SRI. V. SRINIVAS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of court case (Para 1) |
| 2. legal context of land acquisition cases (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. arguments presented by appellants about kiad act (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's observations on legal provisions (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. detailed arguments by parties regarding appropriateness of law (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. arguments related to compensation calculations (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. discussion on legislative amendments affecting acquisition (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. arguments of petitioners for fair compensation under 2013 act (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. court's conclusions on previous legal findings (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 10. final decision on appeals (Para 25) |
| 11. conclusive orders of the court (Para 39) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
These batch of Writ Appeals arise from a common order dated 01.08.2022 of the learned Single Judge in W.Ps.No.5916/2017 c/w. 7980/2017 and 8214/2017 and the common order dated 18.07.2022 of the learned Single Judge in W.Ps.No.108802/2016 c/w. 107748/2014 and 100762/2017.
Writ Petitions No.56771/2013, 35406/2014, 10489/2015, 23940/2015 and 12396/2020 are filed by the private persons (land losers) challenging the awards passed in respect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
