SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 188

S.ABDUL NAZEER
A. C. ANANTHASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
J.B.SHIVASHANKAR, Nadiga Shivanandappa, P.G.C.Chengappa

( 1 ) THE Land in dispute in this case is Sy. No. 47 of Panthar Palya, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South taluk, measuring 24 acres 37 guntas which is morefully described in the schedule to the writ petition, and hereinafter referred to as' schedule land'. Petitioner is the son of Patel chikkahanumaiah and grandson of Hanumanthappa. It is the case of the petitioner that his grandfather was the tenant of the schedule land, having acquired the same under two lease deeds dated 30-6-1927 and 9-5-1936. Hanumanthappa was in possession and enjoyment of the schedule land during his life-time and after his death Patel Chikka Hanumaiah continued to be in possession and enjoyment of the schedule land. On coming into force of Karnataka (personnel and Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954 (for short' the Act'), Patel Chikka hanumaiah applied to the Special Deputy Commissioner for Inam Abolition, Bangalore for grant of occupancy rights of the schedule land. The Special Deputy Commissioner for Inam Abolition, bangalore vide order dated 17-10-1964 ordered for registration of occupancy rights in respect of the schedule land in his favour.

( 2 ) AFTER the passage of about 6 years from the date of the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top