Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR, J
VINOD KUMAR K – Appellant
Versus
CHAITRA N – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim maintenance order is challenged. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner contends respondent misled court. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent claims lack of legal knowledge for omission. (Para 4) |
| 4. court emphasizes necessity for honest disclosures. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 5. court sets aside maintenance award due to suppression of facts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed by the petitioner – husband seeking to set aside the order dated 30.3.2023 passed by the 1st Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, in Crl.Misc. No.188/2019 on the application filed under Section 125 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , whereby the learned Judge of the Family Court granted interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent - wife from the date of petition alongwith litigation expenses of Rs.5,000/-.
2. It is the case of petitioner - husband that respondent - wife filed a petition under the provisions of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Family Court, Bengaluru, seeking maintenance. During the pendency of the main petition, an application came to be filed seeking interim maintenance of Rs.50,000/- per month and litigation expenses of Rs.1,00,000
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
