Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD, J
K. RAGHAVA REDDY & ASSOCIATES – Appellant
Versus
SMT. KAUSALYA THIRPUVANAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background establishing trust and litigation history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by different parties regarding review petitions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observations and reasoning on the legal standing and implications of reviews. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. final conclusion dismissing the review petitions. (Para 18) |
CAV ORDER
114 r/w. Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC , seeking for review of the order dated 07.02.2024 passed in R.P.No.235/2023, whereby, the order dated 15.02.2023 passed in RFA No.1294/2022 was recalled and RFA No.1294/2022 was restored to file.
3. The brief facts of the case are that, the first petitioner is the daughter and the second and third petitioners are the great-grandsons of late V.Ramalingam Mudaliyar. The second respondent is a Trust created as per the order under the Probate, Will and Testament of late V.Ramalingam Mudaliar dated 10.09.1942. In the said Will, late V.Ramalingam Mudaliar, settler of the second respondent had detailed the charitable activities that are to be undertaken by the Trust. Later, the Trust was registered under the Trust Deed dated 13.06.2012 and was renamed “People Char
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
