SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2830

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Mayappa Ningappa Kanakal Since Deceased By His Lrs. - Appellant
Vs.
The Commissioner For Land Acquisition And Rehabilitation And Resettlement Affiliated Secretatary To Government Of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 103883 of 2018 (LA-RES) C/W Writ Petition No. 101726 of 2021
Decided On : 06-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri. Prashant S. Kadadevar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri.Ramesh Chigari, AGA

The court established that compensation is mandatory for acquired land utilized by the state, regardless of possession status.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1) and 6(1) - Writ petition challenging non-passing of award for acquired land - Petitioners allege ownership and utilization of land for rehabilitation center without compensation - Respondents contended no possession taken, thus no award could be granted. (Paras 2, 8, 9)

(B) Legal Principle - The State cannot deny compensation when land has been acquired and utilized, regardless of possession status. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners claimed ownership of specific land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act for a rehabilitation center. They sought a writ for quashing orders denying compensation.

Findings of Court:
The impugned orders were quashed, directing the respondents to consider passing an award for compensation.

Issues: The core issue was whether compensation must be granted when land has been utilized by the state.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that even if the state has not retained physical possession, compensation is still warranted for land utilized.

Result: Petitions allowed in part, with directions to reconsider the compensation.

Table of Content
1. petitioners' claims and requests for relief (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments from both sides regarding land acquisition (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's consideration of the case (Para 5 , 6)
4. observations on the compensation framework and inconsistencies (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. final order allowing petitions in part (Para 10)

ORDER :

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following reliefs:

IN W.P.NO.103883/2018

i) Issue writ in nature of certiorari quashing the order passed by the respondent no.2 vide order bearing no.No.1065 dated:18.01.2018 vide annexure-e with respect to the petitioners.

ii) Issue writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to pass award in respect of the lands of the petitioners in accordance with law.

iii) And also grant such any such any other Writ or Order as deems fit this Hon’ble court in the interest of Justice and equity.

IN W.P.NO.101726/2021

i) Issue writ of certiorari or any other writ or order quashing the communication of the order vide letter no.LAQ/VNV/ Simikeri/20- 21/ 204/2 dated 30.07.2020 issued by the Special Land Acquisition officer, UKP (the Respondent no.3), Bagalkot (Annexure-S).

ii) Acquire the land of the petitioner Veerayya @ Irayya S/O Adrushayya Pujari, bearing RS.No.248/17/ P-1 (RS.No.248/17 shown at sl.no.130 of the list of acquisition of lands, Notified U/sec. 4(1) for Acquisition in LAQ/SR/33/ 1997-98 Equatedin 248/8) measuring 4a-00gs of Simikeri village, Tal and Dist Bagalkot.

iii) To pass Special or Supplementary award for just and fair compensation amount, payable to the petitioner, towards acquisition and taking possession of the land bearing RS.No.248/17/ p-1 (RS.No.248/17 measuring 4a-00gs, mentioned at SL.No.130 of the list of lands notified for acquisition U/Sec. 4(1) of the act) measuring 4a-00GS of Simikeri Village, Tal and Dist. Bagalkot, relying on and considering the mutation entries, record of rights of the land bearing RS.no.248/17/0-1 measuring 4a-00gs of Simikeri village, P.T. sheet Annexure-K dated 02/08/2008 prepared by the Tahasildar Bagalkot (Respondent no.5) and pertinently, the supplementary award prepared by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, UKP, Bagalkot and submitted to the General Manager, land acquisition officer, UKP, Bagalkot, under No.LAQ/SR/ 33/1997-98 dated 18/03/2015 and 08/05/2015 (Annexure-P).

iv) Grant such other reliefs this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstance of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. The petitioners claim to be the owners of land bearing Sy. Nos. 248/8B, 248/8C and 248/17 (new R.S. No.248/17/P-1), measuring 4 acres, 2 acres and 4 acres respectively in Simikeri Village, Bagalkot Taluk. For the purpose of construction of a rehabilitation center for the beneficiary - Karnataka Bhagya Jal Nigam Limited, the government issues a notification under Section 4(1) of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (‘Act’ for shot) and later a final notification under Section 6(1) of the Act. The contention of the petitioners is that no award is passed in the cases of the acquisition of the land of the petitioners. Therefore, they are before this Court after knocking at the doors of the State repeatedly for passing an award and for grant of compensation, as the land of the petitioners has been utilized or locked between the rehabilitation center that is now established.

3. The learned counsel Sri. Prashant S. Kadadevar takes this Court through a document dated 18.01.2018, which captures the entire acquisition process initiated of the subject lands and the surrounding lands. The learned counsel submits that, though the Sy. Nos.248/8B, 248/8C totally measuring 6 acres and 248/17 (new R.S. No.248/17/P-1) measuring 4 acres, became subject matter in the acquisition, the award is not passed in the case at hand.

4. Per contra, the learned AGA on the strength of records or by issuing a notification under Section 16(2) of the Act would seek to contend that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top