Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. G BASAVARAJA, J
SRI VENKATESH @ VENKI S/O NAGARAJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHANNAMANAKERE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal initiation and basic facts (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial procedures and evidence presentation (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defense arguments related to trial fairness (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. principles of fair trial from supreme court rulings (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. final order remanding case for cross-examination (Para 19) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
In this appeal, the appellant is challenging the judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 08.12.2023 passed by the Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge-FTSC-III, Bengaluru in Spl.C.C. No.1779/2021.
3. The trial Court has framed the charges. The accused was enlarged on bail and appeared through his counsel. The charges were framed by the trial Court for the aforesaid offences. The same was read over and explained to the accused. Having understood the same, the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
5. The statement of accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. was recorded. The accused has totally denied the evidence of prosecution witnesses. However, the accused has not adduced any defence evidence on his behalf.
7. Being aggrieved by this judgment of conviction and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred this appeal.
9. As against th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
