IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
S. G. PANDIT, GEETHA K.B., JJ.
A.S. Darshan, S/o. Shivanand – Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Amrutha, W/o. A.S. Darshan – Respondent
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101284 OF 2016 C/W, MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101122 OF 2016
Decided On : 29-10-2025
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner : Sri. Jagadishgouda Patil, Advocate
For the Respondent : Sri. M.M. Patil, Advocate
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions filed under family courts act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of the marriage and petitions. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments of the husband against restitution. (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's findings on the evidence presented. (Para 11 , 15 , 26 , 30) |
| 5. failure to prove mental cruelty. (Para 21 , 22 , 25) |
| 6. final decision on appeals and costs. (Para 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT :
GEETHA K.B., J.
MFA No.101284/2016 is filed under Sec.19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, praying for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2016 passed in MC No.90/2015 on the file of Principal Judge, Family Court, Gadag in a petition for restitution of conjugal rights and to dismiss the said petition by allowing this appeal with costs throughout.
2. MFA No.101122/2016 is filed under Sec.19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, praying for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 22.02.2016 passed in MC No.109/2015 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gadag in a petition for dissolution of marriage and to grant decree of divorce by allowing this appeal with costs throughout.
3. Both these appeals arise out of common judgment passed in MC No.90/2015 and MC No.109/2015 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gadag. Hence, heard arguments commonly in both cases.
4. Parties would be referred to as husband and wife respectively for sake of convenience and clarity.
5. Wife has filed MC No.90/2015 under Sec.9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’), praying for restitution of conjugal rights.
6. Husband has filed MC No.109/2015, praying for a decree of divorce under Sec.13(1)(i) & (ia) of the Act.
7. The case of wife in both petitions in nutshell is that her marriage with husband took place on 23.04.2008 as per Hindu customs at Shubodaya Kalyana Mantap, Hassan in presence of elders. After the marriage, wife started residing with her husband at his place and due to wedlock; she has given birth to twin daughters on 07.03.2010 in her parental house and named them as Nemith and Nimish. Afterwards her husband never visited her house and she has completed her period of postpartum care (banantana) and came back to the house of her husband during August 2010. Only because wife has given birth to twin daughters, she was disrespected in the house of her husband by her husband and his mother–in-law and they were always telling that he would get divorce. Only with an intention to get the decree of divorce, i.e., to prove that she is not having good mental health by force, husband has taken her to Bengaluru; husband was always telling that she was not looking after the children well and assaulting them and abusing them. He was always suspecting the fidelity of the wife and checking her mobile phone and assaulting her, abusing her for small and petty reasons. He was not eating meals prepared by her. Hence, she informed these facts to her elders and they have advised the husband several times. But, he did not heed for their advice. Ultimately, husband quarreled with wife and sent her and their two daughters-Nemith and Nimish during March-2015 to her parental house and immediately, afterwards he sent divorce notice on 25.04.2015 through his advocate to the wife. On 01.05.2015, elders called them and advised them and in that meeting, the husband agreed to take his wife and children back to his house and hence the wife has not given any reply to his notice and waited for him. However, he has not come back; on the other hand, filed M.C.No.72/2015 before the Family Court, Hassan. However, wife intends and is willing to live with her husband and hence she has filed this petition for restitution of conjugal rights.
8. Husband had filed M.C.No.72/2015 before Principal Judge, Family Court, Hassan under Sec.13(1)(i), (ii )& (v) of the Act, praying for dissolution of his marriage with his wife. After filing this petition, it was transferred to Family Court, Gadag, as per Order passed in CP No.1074/2015 and was then re-numbered as MC No.109/20
The court affirmed that substantiated evidence is crucial for claims of cruelty or adultery in marital disputes, ruling that unjustified abandonment entitled the wife to restitution of conjugal right....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that mental cruelty, as a ground for dissolution of marriage, need not cause injury to the petitioner's health, and it must be of such a nature tha....
Long separation and failure to perform marital duties can constitute grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The behavior of a spouse resulting in mental cruelty can justify the grant of divorce under Section 10(1)(x) of the Divorce Act, 1869.
Normal marital disagreements and the presence of in-laws do not constitute mental cruelty sufficient for divorce. The petitioner did not provide adequate evidence to support claims.
Trivial disputes between spouses do not constitute cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, and the burden of proof lies on the party alleging such cruelty.
The statutory provision allows for divorce if no restitution of conjugal rights occurs for over a year post-decree, validating the grounds for divorce.
The court established that a marriage can be dissolved on the grounds of cruelty when continued cohabitation perpetuates mutual suffering, emphasizing the wife's sacrifices and husband's unjust actio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.