SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 2097

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.G.S. KAMAL, J
SMT P UMA HEMAREDDY W/O SHRI K T HEMA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 14124 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. ARUN B M.
For the Respondents:SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, SRI. JAYAKUMAR S. PATIL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. DEEPAK S. SHETTY., ADVOCATE FOR C/R5, R8 & R35, SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. S.B. TOTAD, ADVOCATE FOR R12 TO R14 & R16 TO R26, SRI. PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADVOCATE FOR R15 R4, R7, R9, R10, R11, R27, R28, R29, R32, R33, R34-

The validity of society member induction must be adjudicated by civil courts, not administrative bodies, given the complexity and private nature of disputes surrounding it.

Headnote:(A) Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Quashing of order and notification - Writ petition filed by members of a Society against the Registrar's order regarding membership induction and election - The Court finds significant allegations of manipulation and fabrication in member induction procedures and affirms the need for addressing such disputes in civil courts, given the private nature and complexity of the case. (Para 14)

(B) Society Registration Act, 1960 - Sections 24, 25 - The Court engenders a nuanced approach towards matters of membership and legitimacy, remitting the final determination of member status and related disputes to competent civil jurisdiction while treating the Registrar’s findings as inquiry reports rather than conclusive determinations. (Para 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenge the validity of the induction of 21 members into the Society by the Registrar, claiming they were improperly included while seeking to assert their rights as original members. Events leading to multiple interim petitions and orders from the High Court outline the turbulent history of governance within the Society from 2015 to 2023. (Paras 1-3)

Findings of Court:
The induction of members upon disputed facts leads the Court to ascertain the intricacies of valid membership, emphasizing the need for civil adjudication over administrative declarations. (Para 14)

Issues: Whether the inductions were valid as per the Society's bye-laws and Constitution; The adequacy of processes followed by registrars in society governance matters. (Para 8)

Ratio Decidendi: The ongoing dispute over intertwined allegations of manipulation necessitates comprehensive evidence and scrutiny to settle member legitimacy under civil laws, dismissing administrative findings that do not meet judicial standards of precision and clarity. (Para 16)

Result: Writ petition is partly allowed with specific directives on the status of membership disputes.

Table of Content
1. members assert challenges regarding induction legitimacy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioners argue induction procedures lack adherence to bye-laws. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court observes jurisdictional matters concerning society governance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. final rulings emphasize civil court jurisdiction over administrative findings. (Para 14 , 15)
5. writ petition outcome mandates restoration of previous society governance. (Para 16)

ORAL ORDER

Petitioners claiming to be the members of respondent No.35 -Nutan Educational Association, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as `Society’), are before this Court seeking following reliefs:

"a) Issue a writ of Certiorari and thereby, quash the (i) order dated 02.06.2023 passed by the 3rd Respondent, vide Annexure-A and consequentially,

(b) Notification dated 20.06.2023, vide Annexure-'A1'."

2. Brief facts leading upto the filing of the present petition are:

(a) That upon a notice dated 09.02.2015 issued by the District Registrar- Davanagere District, the then Governing Council of the Society convened a Special General Body Meeting on 14.03.2015. That as on 14.03.2015 there were only 23 members of the society. One Sri.S.S.Mathapathi was the Secretary of the Society. It is alleged that though the Special General Body meeting was held on 14.03.2015, the said Secretary Sri.S.S.Mathapathi had not called for Governing Council meeting for five months despite repeated requests. This constrained the petitioners and respondent No.7 to address a letter dated 03.08.2015 calling for the meeting of Working Committee on 16.08.2015.

(b) In the said meeting, said Sri.S.S.Mathapathi and respondent No.3 were removed from the post of Secretary and President of the society respectively and petitioner No.1 and respondent No.7 were duly elected as President and Secretary of the society respectively and they had taken charge on 24.08.2015.

(c) That on 24.08.2015 the said Sri.S.S.Mathapathi has managed to get a letter styled as "Intimation letter" from the District Registrar who had passed the order of preventing holding of meeting. This constrained the petitioners and respondent No.7 to approach this Court by filing writ petition in W.P.No.43545/2015. An interim order dated 16.10.2015 was passed by this Court staying operation of the said intimation letter dated 24.08.2015. During the pendency of the said writ petition, District Registrar had proceeded to appoint an Administrator by Government Order dated 02.12.2025. This Court by Order dated 16.11.2016 quashed all the orders passed by the District Registrar and directed restoration of position as it existed earlier to 02.12.2015. Administrator consequently handed over the charge on 02.12.2016 to the Governing Council consisting of the petitioners and others.

(d) Thereafter, respondent No.7 who was the Secretary of the respondent-Society had issued a notice dated 02.12.2016 calling for General body meeting to be held on 25.12.2016 which again was interfered with by the Registrar constraining the petitioner to approach this Court yet again by filing writ petition in W.P.No.65571/2016. An interim order was passed staying operation of the said endorsement dated 14.12.2016 issued by the District Registrar.

(e) Petitioners had filed an application seeking direction to convene the General Body meeting of the society with 23 members as on 14.03.2015 in the presence of a retired District Judge as an observer with necessary police protection. Respondents 12 to 26 and 6 others totalling 21 persons claiming to have been inducted as members filed an application seeking their impleadment in the said petition. This Court by order dated 26.07.2019 disposed of the said petition directing preparation of the voters list based on the genuineness of the membership.

(f) Pursuant to the said order respondent No.2 appointed respondent No.3 as the Election Officer. In the first sitting that was held on 04.09.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top