Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MS. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
SHRI MANJEGOWDA S – Appellant
Versus
SMT LALITHA RAJ @ LALITHA H V – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amendments should be allowed to ensure justice is served. (Para 1 , 4 , 16) |
| 2. petitioner claims soundness of deceased during critical periods. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal principles favoring liberal amendments are highlighted. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The present petition seeks to challenge the order dated 19.03.2021 passed on IA No.2 in O.S.No.534/2018 by the learned V Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, captioned as Annexure-H (hereinafter referred to as the "Impugned Order"). By the Impugned Order, the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the CPC by the petitioner/defendant No.9, has been dismissed with costs on the petitioner/defendant No.9.
2. None appears for the respondents No.1 to 4 despite service. The service to respondent No.5 to 12 has already been dispensed with by order dated 24.08.2021.
3. On the last date of hearing, i.e., on 05.01.2026 after briefly hearing the counsel for the petitioner/defendant No.9, the Court has passed the following order :
"3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requests for some time to make his submissions on how the amendments sought by him in his application are relevant for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
