Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P. Sandesh, Venkatesh Naik T, JJ
Sri. Jayarama @ Bangaru – Appellant
Versus
State by Devika M Saligrama Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal and conviction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual matrix and cause of death established. (Para 3 , 4 , 28) |
| 3. arguments against conviction based on prosecution's evidence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. counterarguments supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. legal precedents cited for circumstantial evidence. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. court's observations on last seen evidence and motive. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. analysis of conduct and recovery of gold ornaments. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. conclusion on sufficiency of circumstantial evidence. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 9. dismissal of the appeal with directive for surrender. (Para 33) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and also Smt.Rashmi Patel, the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent-State.
2. This appeal is filed against the judgment of conviction for the offence punishable under Section 498A and also Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and life imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under and also one year punishment for the offence under of IPC with fine of Rs.200/-.
3. Th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
