Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANU SIVARAMAN, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, JJ
SMT. RAKSHITHA W/O S. C. SANTHOSH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detenue seeks habeas corpus for quashing detention. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues illegible documents hinder effective representation. (Para 4) |
| 3. court underscores importance of providing clear documentation. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 4. court examines procedural safeguards in detention context. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. illegibility affects ability to challenge detention, rendering it illegal. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. court holds detention order invalid based on procedural failures. (Para 13 , 18) |
CAV ORDER
(HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
This petition is filed by the wife of the detenue seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the detention order dated 29.08.2025 passed in No.MAG- 300/2025-26 by the Respondent No. 2 and the confirmation order dated 10.10.2025 in H.D. 472 SST 2025 passed by the Respondent No.1 and to further writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to set the detenue at liberty by releasing him from prison.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of this petition are that, the detenue has been detained pursuant to the Order of Detention passed by the respondent No.2 against the detenue on 29.08.2025 under Section 2(g) of the Karnataka Pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
