Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. Nataraj, J
CHAMAN BHARTIYA FOUNDATION, A PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST – Appellant
Versus
THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. multiple writ petitions regarding public road obstruction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. dispute over the classification of road as public vs private. (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court maintains status-quo pending resolution in civil court. (Para 21 , 26) |
| 4. status of road classified for public use despite existing disputes. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORAL ORDER
W.P.No.19965/2024 is filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to erect signboards, clearly declaring the schedule road to be a public street; a writ in the nature of mandamus is also sought to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to prevent any blockage or restriction of access over the schedule road from respondent Nos.3 to 5 or anyone else acting on their behalf; and writ in the nature of mandamus is also sought directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to initiate appropriate action under the provisions of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2020 (henceforth referred to as ‘the BBMP Act, 2020 ’ for short) as against respondent Nos.3 to 5 for blocking and causing obstruction of public street.
3. W.P.No.32115/2024 is filed seeking for writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
