Back
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Ashok S.Kinagi, J
R. Janardhana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and procedural history of the regularization claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. arguments regarding work duration and the effect of absence of sanctioned posts on regularization rights. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 13) |
| 3. interpretation of supreme court precedents on fair treatment of long-term temporary employees. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final order directing reconsideration of regularization based on landmark jurisprudence. (Para 14) |
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO. 488324/DMA/EST2/DAWE/34/2021/5498 DATED 06/11/2023 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-Z TO THE WP. b) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REGULARIZE THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONERS FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE PETITIONERS HAVE COMPLETED 10 YEARS OF SERVICE IN THE OFFICE OF THE R4 AND EXTEND ALL OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL MONETARY BENEFITS, UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND c) DIRECTING TO THE R1 AND 2 TO MERGE THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER IN TUMKURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE THE DATE ON WHICH THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONERS MERGED IN TUMKURU MUNICIPAL COUNCIL FROM MANDAL PANCHAYATH HAS RECOMM
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
