SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 45956

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, A.HARIPRASAD, SHIRCY V., JJ
JOY DANIEL – Appellant
Versus
N.A.IBRAHIMKUTTY – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN, SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN

O R D E R

Abdul Rehim, J:

A Division Bench of this court, through its order dated

20-03-2018, referred the above case to be heard by a Full Bench, on the question regarding maintainability of an application filed under Section 12 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) in an appeal filed against an order passed under (3)

of the Act.

2. Brief facts of the case are that, the landlord instituted a Rent Control Petition seeking eviction of the tenant, on the grounds enumerated under Sections 11 (2) (b), 11 (3) and 11 (4) (v) of the Act. Tenant resisted the petition by filing objections. During pendency of the Rent Control Petition, the landlord filed an interim application under Section 12 of the Act, seeking direction against the tenant to deposit the admitted arrears of rent. The Rent Control Court passed an order under (1) directing the tenant to pay the admitted arrears, within the date stipulated thereunder. The tenant failed to make deposit / payment of the admitted arrears. The landlord thereupon filed another application seeking orders under sub-section (3) of of the Act. The said application was allowe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top