SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 47976

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
AMJAD ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
ADV. SRI. JOSEPH RONY JOSE, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. T.K. ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 14th day of January, 2021 S. Manikumar, CJ Instant writ petitions are filed seeking for a direction to remove the unauthorised and unwanted postures, advertisement boards, hoardings, cut outs, buntings, hangings, billboards etc., placed on public roads and streets, and to recover the expenses incurred for the same from the persons or companies responsible, as arrears of land revenue.

2. W.P.(C) No.5218/2012 is for the following reliefs:

(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents, to see that while setting up of advertisement boards and arches in the public streets and public places, the rules enacted by the Legislature in 1999 under the Municipality Act is being complied with by the persons, who erect advertisement boards and arches in the public streets and public places;

(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents, to examine and see as to whether the boards and arches are erected scientifically, without causing obstruction for view and diversion of attention of the drivers while driving the vehicle on the public road;

(iii) To issue a wri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top