SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SUNIL MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER MUSEUM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 6319 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SOORAJ T.ELENJICKAL, SMT.HELEN P.A., ADV.STEPHANIE SHARON, SRI.ATHUL ROY, SRI.INDRAJITH DILEEP
For the Respondents: SMT. SREEJA V.

The court ruled that bail conditions restricting freedom of press must be reasonable, aligning with constitutional guarantees on free expression.

Headnote:The petitioner challenges a condition imposed while granting anticipatory bail, alleging infringement of press freedom. The court reviewed provisions under Section 438 Cr.P.C, noting conditions must be reasonable. It held a blanket restraint on news reporting contravenes the right to freedom of expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a). The court finds the restriction unreasonable and deletes it. The anticipatory bail is granted without that condition.

Table of Content
1. bail conditions must align with constitutional freedoms. (Para 1 , 5 , 7 , 8)
2. allegations of press misconduct relate to judicial scrutiny. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. journalistic freedom is integral to a democratic society. (Para 9 , 12 , 14)
4. conditions on bail cannot violate fundamental rights. (Para 10 , 11)
5. the unreasonable condition is stricken from the bail order. (Para 15)

ORDER

Petitioner challenges one of the conditions imposed upon him while granting anticipatory bail.

2. The Supreme Head of the Believers Church - Sri. K.P. Yohannan alias Moran Mar Athanasius Yohan Metropolitan is alleged to have died in an accident during a visit to the United States of America. Petitioner who claims to be the Managing Editor of a YouTube news channel called ‘i2i News’ alleges that he, as a professional journalist, obtained information during his investigative journalism that there was foul play behind the death of the Bishop and filed complaints before the State Police Chief with all good faith. A petition dated 28-05-2024 has been submitted by the petitioner before the State Police Chief.

3. In the meantime, a complaint was filed by another Bishop of the Believers Church, alleging that on 09-05-2024 and 21-05-2024, the second accused had aired false news through his news channel - the first accused, stating that the death of the Bishop was not accidental but was the result of a planned murder. It was also alleged that the third accused demanded advertisements on the news channel failing which the accused threatened the Church of publishing such false news which would have a tendency to create division among the Church members.

4. Based on the above complaint dated 24-05-2024, FIR No.752 of 2024 of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, was registered on 29-05 2024 alleging offences under sections 153, 120B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 apart from Section 120 (o) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 with the news channel as the first accused, petitioner as the second accused and a marketing executive of the channel as the third accused. Later, section 384 IPC was also added and hence petitioner sought protection from arrest. While granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, the learned Sessions Judge imposed the condition that he shall not air any news related to the death of Sri. K.P.Yohannan until his petition before the State Police Chief is disposed off. The said condition is challenged in this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 .

5. I have heard Sri. Sooraj Thomas Elanjickal, the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt. Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.

6. Concededly, petitioner is a journalist operating a news channel by name ‘i2i News’. He is alleged to have published news relating to the death of the Bishop of Believers Church portraying it to be a murder and not an accidental death. Petitioner has already filed complaints before the State Police Chief to investigate into the allegation. The information allegedly collected by him is stated to have been published through his news channel on two different days. The only non-bailable offence alleged against the accused is under section 384 IPC . The learned Sessions Judge felt it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner but imposed conditions which included a restraint on publishing any news relating to the death of the said Bishop.

7. The question raised relates to the freedom of the press vis-a-vis conditions that can be imposed in a bail order. While penning this judgment, this Court is reminded of the words of Nobel Laureate Albert Camus that “A free press can, of course, be both good and bad, but, most certainly, without freedom, the press will never be anything but bad”. Freedom of the press is a prerogative that no country can ill afford to renounce. However much people may hate a free press, its absence leads to curtailment of democratic rights and even liberty. The absence o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top