SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 18994

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
MUHAMMED FAYIS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
C.Y.VINOD KUMAR, AADIL NAZARUDEEN

ORDER

This Crl.M.C is filed to quash the order dated 04.09.2023 in Crl.M.P No.2021 of 2023 on the file of the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act and NDPS Act cases, Manjeri. This a petition filed under Section 451 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner, who is an accused in Crime No.34 of 2023 of Excise Range, Ponnani. The offence alleged are punishable under Sections 22 (b) and 29 of the NDPS Act. According to the petitioner, his mobile phone was seized by the excise officials when he was arrested and the petitioner seeks release of the mobile phone. The same is dismissed by the learned Judge stating that the mobile phone may have to be tendered in the evidence during trial to prove the petitioner’s arrest. Aggrieved by the same, this Crl.M.C is filed.

2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the public prosecutor.

3. The public prosecutor submitted that the CDR details are already taken from the service provider and it is kept in the court. After hearing both sides and also going through the impugned order, I am of the considered opinion that the order passed by the learned special Judge is not in tune with the principle laid down by the Apex Court inSunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top