SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 43903

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
HASEENA
– Appellant
Versus

SAITHUTTI HAJI – Respondent


Advocates:
M.MUHAMMED SHAFI, T.RASINI, AYISHA AFRIN A.V.K.

O R D E R

The accused in ST No.78 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kalpetta has filed this revision petition under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter will be referred as Cr.P.C. for convenience) challenging conviction and sentence imposed by the Magistrate Court in the above case as per judgment dated 31.05.2019 and confirmed by the learned Sessions Court as per judgment dated 03.09.2022 in Crl.Appeal No.52 of 2019. The respondents herein are the State of Kerala as well as the original complainant.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/the accused as well as the learned Public Prosecutor on admission.

3. I shall refer the parties in this Revision Petition as ‘complainant’ and ‘accused’ for convenience.

4. Summary of the case advanced by the complainant before the trial court is as under: The complainant initiated prosecution alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of the NI Act, when cheque for Rs.7,00,000/- dated 03.11.2017 alleged to be issued by the accused to the complainant in discharge of advanced sale consideration given by the complainant to the husband of the accused as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top