SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30644

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
P.S.SUSHYNA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alexander Thomas, J.

Being aggrieved by the impugned Annexure-A2 order dated 25.02.2016, Annexure-A3 order dated 09.05.2016 and Annexure-A4 order dated 05.08.2016, extending the original suspension order as per Annexure-A1 dated 11.11.2015, issued by the 3rd respondent, in exercise of the powers under Sub-rules 6 & 7 of Rule 10 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, the respondent herein had filed the instant Ext.P1 original application, O.A.No.911 of 2016 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench with the following prayers [see page No.19 of the paper book of this O.P.]:

“(i) To declare that Annexure A2 t0 Annexure A4 orders are illegal and inoperative and the Applicant will stand deemed to have been reinstated back to service with effect from 10/02/2016 with all consequential benefits and arrears of pay.

(ii) To direct the respondents to reinstate the Applicant back to service with effect from 10/02/2016 with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay.

(iii) Grant such other reliefs as may be prayed for and as the Court may deem fit to grant, and (iv) Grant the cost of this Original Application.”

2. The Tribunal, after hearing both sides, has rendered Ext.P2 final

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top