HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sathish Ninan, J
MURALEEDHARAN, – Appellant
Versus
THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY, – Respondent
[WP(C) Nos.8481/2022, 8491/2022, 8654/2022]
The petitioner purchased three vehicles. He submitted applications seeking for change of class of vehicles as an educational institution bus. Question arose as to whether compliance with the AIS standards as prescribed in Rule 125(C) of the Central Motor Vehicles Act is required.
2. In W.A.No.1678 of 2018 and connected cases, a Division Bench of this Court, interpreting Rule 125C of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules and the applicability of AIS:052 to existing models of vehicles, held, “We have considered the submissions of the learned Government Pleader for the appellants but, we are afraid, we cannot read Rule 125C in the manner suggested by the appellants. A mere perusal of the Rules would indicate that while Rule 125C (1) mandated that only new models of buses with seating capacity of 13 or more passengers excluding driver had to have the body built in accordance with new specifications (AIS:052 (Rev-1) 2008) at the time of presentation for testing and approval for body building, the proviso to the said Rule made the requirement applicable to existing models of such buses as well, on and after 1.4.2015. In either event, the rul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.