SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 5865

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J
MUHAMMED HANEEFA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.K.T.SAJU, SRI. SURESH BABU THOMAS

ORDER

The petitioner is the second accused in C.C.No.54 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Mannarkkad. The first accused is an authorised retail distributor of ration articles. The allegation is that on 1.11.2009 the first accused sold 100 litres of kerosene to the petitioner, who purchased it for use other than cooking or illumination. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mannarkkad arrested both of them, seized the kerosene along with the vehicle used for its transportation at 1 in the morning just in front of the shop of the first accused. The Sub Inspector filed final report alleging that they committed the offence under Section 7 (1)(a)(ii) read with Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act (for short the Act). In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C the proceedings in the trial court are sought to be quashed mainly on the grounds that the facts of the case do not attract any offence, and the arrest, seizure and investigation are illegal since the Sub Inspector was not competent to do so.

2. Heard Sri.K.T.Saju, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Suresh Babu Thomas, the learned Additional State Prosecutor.

3. At the hearing the argume

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top