HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J
ABDUL RASHID – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) – Respondent
WP(C)/31996/2006
Compensation - Land Acquisition - Kerala Land Acquisition Act - Sections 28A, 18 - The court interpreted Section 28A to clarify that the time limit for seeking redetermination of compensation begins from the date of the reference court's judgment, not the appellate court's order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, owners of land acquired for public purposes, sought enhanced compensation under Section 28A after adjacent landowners received increased awards, yet faced dismissal from the Land Acquisition Officer for late applications.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applications were not within the correct time frame as per Section 28A and previous case law. It upheld that the period for applying for redetermination starts from the reference court's award date, not the appellate decisions.
Issues: Whether the time limit for filing claims under Section 28A begins from the reference court's award or the appellate court's order.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that under Section 28A, the time limit for claims must start from the date of the reference court's award, reinforcing the principle of equitable treatment regarding compensation.
Final Decision: Writ Petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are owners of properties situated in Mammiyoor Village.
Lands owned by the petitioners were acquired for a public purpose. They did not file petition under Section 18 of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act (for short 'the Act') for referring the matter to the Land Acquisition Court for determining enhancement in the compensation. But some of the owners of properties lying adjacent to the properties owned by the petitioners filed applications under of the Act claiming enhancement. Those cases were referred to Sub Court, Thrissur by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Sub Judge, Thrissur enhanced the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. On 20.12.2002 petitioners had filed Ext.P2 series applications under Section 28A of the Act claiming benefit under that Section. Those applications were dismissed by the Land Acquisition Officer vide Ext.P4 series orders dated 9.10.2006, 11.10.2006 and 28.10.2006. Thereafter petitioners have filed applications under (3) of the Act. Challenging Ext.P1 judgment the requisitioning authority filed L.A.A.No.1401/2002 and connected cases before this Court. This Court by judgment dated 12.12.2005 dismissed all the appeals. The main contention raised by the petitioners is that since they have filed application before the judgment of this Court, those applications must be deemed to be within the time. It is argued WP(C) No.31996/2006 2 that a person who claims benefit under of the Act is entitled to get the value fixed by the reference court which is modified or enhanced by the appellate or revisional court. According to the respondents even though the claimant under is entitled to get the value fixed by the appellate court the time for filing the application is three months from the date of order of the Land Acquisition Court and not from the date of order of appellate or revisional court.
Section 28A reads as follows:
28A. Re-determination of the amount of compensation on the basis of the award of the Court.-
(1) Where in an award under this Part, the Court allows to the applicant any amount of compensation in excess of the amount awarded by the Collector under Section 11, the persons interested in all the other land covered by the same notification under Section 4, sub-section (1) and who are also aggrieved by the award of the Collector may, notwithstanding that they had not made an application to the Collector under Section 18 , by written application to the Collector within three months from the date of the award of the Court require that the amount of compensation payable to them may be re- determined on the basis of the amount of compensation awarded by the Court:
Provided that in computing the period of three months within which an application to the Collector shall be made under this sub-section, the day on which the award was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the award shall be excluded.
2. The Collector shall, on receipt of an application under sub-section (1), conduct an inquiry after giving notice to all the persons interested and giving them a reasonable opportunity of being heard WP(C) No.31996/2006 3 and make an award determining the amount of compensation payable to the applicants.
3. Any person who has not accepted the award under sub-section (2) may, by written application to the Collector, require that the matter be referred by the Collector for the determination of the Court and the provisions of Sections 18 to 28 shall, so far as may be, apply to such reference as they apply to a reference under Section 18 .
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners relied on a decision reported in Union of India v. Munshi Ram ( 2006(2) KLT 992 ) in which it was held as follows:
“........the amount payable under S.28-A of the Act is the amount which is finally payable by way of compensation to the owners of the land who challenged the award of the Collector and claimed reference under S.18 of the Act. The said provision seeks to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.