SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30911

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J
ANOOP.R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.JOHN JOSEPH(ROY) 2) SANOOP.R. SO.RAMADAS AGED 24 YEARS

J U D G M E N T

In all these cases, the issue is regarding Community Certificate which the petitioners claim to be issued on the basis that they belong to Thandan (Scheduled Caste).

2. In W.P.(C) No.18454/2009, the petitioner is the parent whereas in other writ petitions, the petitioners are the children of persons who are having the caste status as Thandan.

3. Heard the learned Special Government Pleader also.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the absence of any enquiry by the KIRTADS or by the Scrutiny Committee, the respective Tahsildars cannot reject the application for issuance of Community Certificate. Learned Special Government Pleader submits that in all these matters, applications have been rejected and the remedy of the petitioners if at all is to file an appeal/revision petition.

4. In W.P.(C) No.18454/2009, it is submitted by the W.P.(C) No.18356/2009 & conn. cases 2 learned Government Pleader that the matter was heard on 21.10.2009 and an order was passed on 11.11.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner in the said writ petition submits that so far the order has not been communicated to the petitioner. There will be a direction to the Tahsildar to commu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top