HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.N.KRISHNAN, J
DAINABI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
P.NARAYANAN – Respondent
J UDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking to set aside the order of the Munsiff's Court, Hosdurg in I.A.No.928/2004 in O.S.No.114/2001. The said application is one for amendment of the written statement under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. The plaintiff has instituted a suit for realisation of the amount and the defendant, who is the petitioner has filed a written statement raising the contention that he is entitled to much more amount from the plaintiff and he intends to file a separate suit for realisation of the same. Thereafter the petitioner, viz., the defendant filed an application for amendment of the written statement, whereby he wanted to set up the case of a counter claim. It was strongly opposed by the other side, viz., the plaintiff on the ground that the relief sought to be incorporated in the form of a counter claim is barred by limitation and therefore the court should not allow the application for amendment. The court, on a consideration of the materials and relying on the decision of this Court reported in Sabhari Syndicate v. Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.(2001(1) KLT 646) held that even if the counter claim is barred by limitation as on the date of filing of the applicati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.