IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
Rosamma Thomas – Appellant
Versus
Kottayam Municipality – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Petitioners in all these writ petitions are owners of commercial buildings situated in Kottayam Municipality. They challenge the demand notices issued to them demanding property tax for their respective buildings. In some of the writ petitions, the Government Order dated 06-03-2019, directing collection of property tax on plinth area basis from 01-04-2016 is also challenged.
2. W.P.(C) No. 29844 of 2022 is treated as the leading case in this batch of writ petitions. Petitioner in the said writ petition is the owner of two buildings in Kottayam and had been paying property tax upto second half of 2021-22. However, in 2022, she was served with two demand notices for property tax for a period of five years i.e., from 2016-17 onwards. According to the petitioner, the demand notices have been issued without complying with the procedure prescribed by law for assessing property tax and that tax has been demanded with retrospective effect, with one hundred percent hike from the existing rate of tax. Petitioner also alleges that demand has been made without even giving credit to the tax already paid till the second half of 2021-22. Petitioner has also pleaded that the demand of pro
Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. Modi Sugar Mills Ltd.
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Board, Rampur
Rai Vimal Krishna and Others v. State of Bihar and Others
Sonik Industries, Rajkot v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Rajkot
Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi v. Hari Chand Shri Gopal and Others
Corporation of Cochin v. New India Maritime Agencies (P) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.