SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 68626

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
ANURAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Application No. 5549 of 2023|Bail Application No. 5686 of 2023|Bail Application No. 5693 of 2023|Bail Application No. 5957 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Sarath Babu Kottakkal, Jithin Babu, K.R.Arun Krishnan|For the Respondents: C.S.Hrithwik, Neema.T.V, Seetha.S, Grashious Kuriakose, S.Rajeev

Accused have a right to expeditious testing of seized substances under the NDPS Act, with strict adherence to timelines for chemical analysis reports to ensure fair trial rights.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(b), 20(c), 37, and Rule 14 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, 2022 - Right of accused for expeditious testing of seized drugs - The court emphasized the necessity for timely chemical analysis reports to ensure fair trial rights, highlighting delays in testing as prejudicial to the accused. (Paras 1, 26)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail under NDPS Act - The court reiterated that the rigour under Section 37 applies only if commercial quantity is established, necessitating timely chemical analysis to ascertain the nature of the contraband. (Paras 19, 25)

Facts of the case:
The accused were arrested on 6.4.2023 with 14.84 grams of MDMA, which was later identified as methamphetamine, an intermediate quantity. The delay in chemical analysis reports led to the court granting interim bail after four months of incarceration.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the State to ensure compliance with Rule 14 for timely chemical analysis, allowing the accused to seek court intervention for delays.

Issues: Whether an accused has the right to seek expeditious testing of seized substances under the NDPS Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that delays in chemical analysis reports violate the accused's rights and mandated adherence to the stipulated timelines in Rule 14.

Result: Applications disposed of with directions for compliance with testing timelines and interim bail made absolute.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the bail application. (Para 2)
2. court's directive for chemical analysis reports. (Para 5 , 6)
3. government's responsibility for timely testing. (Para 8 , 9)
4. importance of forensic testing in drug cases. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. legal provisions regarding commercial quantity. (Para 19 , 20)
6. impact of chemical analysis on bail decisions. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
7. court's final directives on testing timelines. (Para 26 , 27)

C O M M O N O R D E R

Does an accused have the right to seek for the expeditious testing of the seized drugs/substances under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , of 1985?

2. The accused 1 to 4 in Crime No.291/2023 of the Kattoor Police Station, Thrissur, have individually filed these applications under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, to enlarge them on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 6.4.2023.

3. The factual matrix of the prosecution case is that: on

6.4.2023, at around 16.20 hours, 14.84 grams of “MDMA” (methylenedioxy methamphetamine) was seized from the accused 1 to 4 at the residence of the first accused at Pullathara Desom, Karalam Panchayat. The accused were arrested on the spot with the contraband substance and, thereby, they have committed the offences under Section s 20 (b) and 20 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (in short, ‘NDPS Act’) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. When the applications came up for consideration on

25.7.2023, this Court, after analysing Rule 14 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, 2022 (‘Rules’, for brevity), directed the respondent to file a statement indicating the action taken by the State of Kerala to submit chemical analysis reports of the seized contraband drugs and substances (in short contraband) within the time frame stipulated by the Rules.

5. During the subsequent hearing of the applications on

8.8.2023, it was reported that, as per the chemical analysis report, the contraband allegedly seized from the petitioners is ‘methamphetamine’ and not ‘MDMA’ and is, therefore, of an intermediate quantity as per the Specification of Small and Commercial Quantity of Narcotic Drug or Psychotropic Substance fixed by the Central Government vide. S.O No.1055(E) dated 19.10.2001. Consequently, this Court enlarged the petitioners on interim bail. Nevertheless, the learned Additional Director General of Prosecution was directed to file the statement as ordered on 25.07.2023.

6. Accordingly, on 14.9.2023 the Additional Chief Secretary to the Government of Kerala filed a report, inter alia, stating as follows:

“At present State Forensic Lab and three Regional Forensic Science Laboratories functioning in the State are having sufficient facilities for narcotic examinations. Total number of NDPS cases pending across the State is 1699. The FSL Director reported that all the facilities are available for examination of NDPS cases in the RFSLs. Moreover, the Narcotic Division of RFSL, Thrissur, has been functioning since 2020, which carry out only the examination of Narcotic Substances. A separate floor has been constructed at RFSL, Thrissur for the purpose.

The lack of man power is the major hurdle for speedy disposal of cases including NDPS cases. A comprehensive proposal for creation of 98, including 79 technical posts, in the FSL is under the active consideration of Government. If the above requested posts are sanctioned all the hurdles pertaining to speedy disposal of cases would be settled to a considerable extent.

Since the Hon’ble High Court has expressed huge concern over the delay in examining narcotic cases, the State Police Chief has been requested to examine the possibility of establishing a Lab/converting an existing lab, for the purpose and if necessary, to furnish detailed and comprehensive proposal by incorporating details of the infrastructure facility, total expected expenditure for the project, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top