Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Babu, J
BINDULAL V.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. corruption allegations in university selection process. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 2. responses regarding investigation and transparency. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. requirement for prior approval under section 17a. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. directive for preliminary enquiry. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:-
“1. Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ order or direction, directing the 1st, 2nd and 8th respondent to constitute a special investigation team and to conduct investigation in the matter stated in Exhibit P9, in a time bound manner and in supervision of this Hon’ble Court.
2. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ order or direction, directing the 8th respondent to take appropriate legal actions based on the matters raised in Exhibit P9.
3. This Hon’ble Court may grant leave to the petitioners from filing the translation of the vernacular documents produced with the writ petition.
4. Issue appropriate order or directing that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. The petitioners were the applicants for the post of sweeper-cum-cleaner in th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
