SUNIL THOMAS
Shankara Bhat – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor – Respondent
ORDER :
In all the Crl.M.Cs, the respective petitioners stand arrayed as accused in different crimes, registered against each of them, under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. They challenge the prosecution proceedings launched against them.
2. Crl.M.C.No.7542/2019 is filed by the Secretary of Mughu Service Co-operative Bank, Kasaragod. Crl.M.C.No..8308/2018 is filed by the Director Board Members of the above Co-operative Bank. The petitioner in Crl.M.C No.7542/2018 is the second accused and the petitioners in Crl.M.C.No.8308/2018 are the accused Nos. 5 to 10 and 12 to 14 in a complaint filed before the Enquiry Commissioner and the Special Judge, Thalassery, under section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging commission of offences punishable under section 13(1)( c) (i) and 13 (1) (d) (ii) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. The petitioners in all the other Crl.M.Cs are respectively accused Nos.1, 3, 8 and 9 in FIR No.1/2018 of VACB Ernakulam unit, for offences punishable under sections 13(2) read with 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and Sections 201, 204, 464, 465,471 and section 120B of IPC.
3. In the comp
Baijnath Gupta & Ors v.State of Madhya Pradesh
Dr. Subramanyam Swami v. Centre for Public Interest Litigation
H.B.Gill & Another v. the King
Harihar Prasad v. State of Bihar
Om Prakash Gupta v. State of U.P.
Prakash Singh Badal & another v. State of M.P.
Punjab State Warehousing Corporation v. Bhushan Chander & another
Rajib Ranjan & Others v. R.Vijayakumar
S.B.Saha & Others v. M.S.Kochar
Shambhoonath Mishra v. State of U.P. & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.