IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SOPHY THOMAS, J
N.M.MINERALS INDIA PRIVATE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
P.K.RAJU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainant's claim for cheque dishonor (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. timeliness and methods of cheque presentation (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. criminal liability under section 138 based on cheque validity (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 24) |
| 4. sentence and compensation ruling (Para 25 , 26) |
J U D G M E N T
This appeal is at the instance of the complainant in CC No.653 of 2002 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Cherthala, challenging acquittal of the accused, in a complaint filed by him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (N.I.Act for short), as per judgment dated 31/1/2006.
2. The complainant-N.M.Minerals India Private Ltd is a Private Limited Company registered under the Indian Companies Act, represented by its power of attorney holder.
3. The case of the appellant/complainant is that, towards the price of mineral water purchased by the accused from that company, he owed a sum of Rs.34,940/-, and towards discharge of that liability, he issued Ext.P1 cheque dated 23/8/2001 drawn on District Co-operative Bank, Kunnukuzhy Branch, Thiruvananthapuram. When that cheque was sent for collection through his bank i.e. Dhanlaxmi Bank, Cherthala Branch on 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.