SHEREENA vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM), G.RAJAGOPAL (KUMMANAM)
For the Respondents: G SUDHEER, PP

Table of Content
1. anticipatory bail applications must be evaluated on the basis of the underlying motives. (Para 1)
2. fact summary involving the appellants and the victim together with the relevant allegations. (Para 2 , 3)
3. arguments from appellants regarding false implications based on prior incidents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. observations on prosecution's ability to prove their case against the appellants. (Para 7 , 8 , 11)
5. importance of evaluating a complaint's veracity in context of previous animosities. (Para 14 , 15)
6. final ruling concerning anticipatory bail and conditions of release. (Para 19)

K.BABU, J.-------------------------------------

Crl.A.NoS.1980 & 1987 of 2024 ----------------------------------------

Dated this the 5^th day of November, 2024

COMMON JUDGMENT

These appeals are filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 . The challenge in these appeals is to the order dated 27.09.2024 in CRMC No.1591/2024 and the order dated 10.10.2024 in CRMC No.1851 passed by Sessions Court, Kozhikode.

2. The appellant in Crl.A.No.1980 of 2024 is accused No.1 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.1987 of 2024 is accused No.2. T