SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Gazette Copy
AI highlight Precision Paragraph Copy AI Assistant AI Assistant Add to Editor Bookmak Share Document Go to Top Go to Bottom Zoom In Zoom Out Print Download PDF Court Copy Open In App

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Read full Act
S.3 Punishments for offences atrocities.

1[(1) Whoever, not being a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe,--

(a) puts any inedible or obnoxious substance into the mouth of a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe or forces such member to drink or eat such inedible or obnoxious substance;
(b) dumps excreta, sewage, carcasses or any other obnoxious substance in premises, or at the entrance of the premises, occupied by a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe;
(c) with intent to cause injury, insult or annoyance to any member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe, dumps excreta, waste matter, carcasses or any other obnoxious substance in his neighbourhoo

Legal Commentary on Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Introduction

Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is a crucial provision aimed at combating atrocities, hate crimes, and discrimination faced by members of SCs and STs. It prescribes specific offences, their essential ingredients, and the punishments for acts of atrocities committed against these vulnerable communities, emphasizing the importance of intent, knowledge, and the nature of acts committed.

What does Section 3 Say?

Section 3 enumerates various offences and acts that constitute atrocities under the Act, including:- Insulting or intimidating members of SCs/STs with caste-based slurs or abusive language (Section 3(1)(r))- Forcing or compelling members of SCs/STs to drink or eat obnoxious substances (Section 3(1)(a))- Assault, sexual violence, or causing grievous hurt based on caste (Section 3(1)(x), 3(1)(xii))- Committing acts that cause humiliation, insult, or discrimination in public or private settings.

It also prescribes punishments ranging from imprisonment for a minimum of six months to extended terms, depending on the offence.

Essential Ingredients

The essential ingredients for offences under Section 3 include:- The act must be committed intentionally or with knowledge that it will insult, humiliate, or discriminate against a member of SC/ST (Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(x), 3(1)(xii))- The act must be directed at a member of SC/ST community- The act must be committed in a manner that causes insult, intimidation, or humiliation, either publicly or privately- The act must be proven with evidence establishing mens rea (intent or knowledge), especially in cases of caste-based slurs or physical violence- For certain offences, the act must be committed in public view or involve specific conduct like caste slurs, physical assault, or sexual violence.

Scope of Section

The scope of Section 3 is broad, covering:- Verbal abuses, caste slurs, and caste-based insults- Physical violence, assault, and sexual offences- Acts that cause humiliation, social ostracization, or economic boycott- Acts committed both in public and private settings, provided they are caste-based- Acts by individuals, groups, or public servants acting in official capacity, with the caveat of intent and knowledge- The provision also emphasizes the importance of proving mens rea, i.e., the intention to insult or humiliate based on caste.

Punishment for Section 3 Offences

The Act prescribes rigorous punishments, including:- Imprisonment for a minimum of six months, which can extend up to five years or more, depending on the specific offence [Source: ""]- Fine as prescribed under the Act- Enhanced punishments for repeat offenders or offences involving sexual violence, grievous hurt, or death- Specific provisions for compensation and social rehabilitation of victims, especially in cases of sexual offences or atrocities causing injury or death [Source: "M. C. Prasannah VS State"]- In some cases, courts have the discretion to reduce sentences or grant benefit of probation if the circumstances warrant [Source: "Jagji VS State of Rajasthan"]

Legal Comments (Summary)

  • "Mens rea" — Establishing intent or knowledge is critical for conviction under Section 3, especially for acts like caste-based insult or humiliation [Source: "Francis Salaysia VS State"]
  • "Proof of caste" — The act of insulting or humiliating a person must be linked to their belonging to SC/ST, and the prosecution must prove this with evidence of caste identity and intent [Source: "Francis Salaysia VS State"]
  • "Verbal abuses" — Calling a person by caste name or caste slur in public or private may constitute an offence if it is proved that the act was intended to insult or humiliate [Source: "Rosamma Thomas VS C. I. of Police"]
  • "Physical violence" — Acts of assault, molestation, or causing grievous hurt on caste basis fall within the scope of offences under Section 3, provided intent or knowledge is established [Source: "Abhishek Mishra S/o Dinesh Kumar Mishra vs State of Karnataka"]
  • "Sexual offences" — Rape or sexual assault against members of SC/ST are punishable under both IPC and the Act; however, conviction requires proof that the act was caste-based or motivated by caste bias [Source: "M. C. Prasannah VS State"]
  • "Knowledge and intent" — The prosecution must establish that the accused knew the caste of the victim and that the act was committed with the purpose of humiliating or insulting them [Source: "Subhadra VS State of U. P. "]
  • "Acts in public view" — Many offences under Section 3 specify that acts committed in public view or in a manner accessible to the public are more likely to attract conviction [Source: "Jyoti Arora VS State of Haryana"]
  • "Discretion of courts" — Courts have held that minor variations in evidence or discrepancies do not necessarily vitiate the conviction if the essential ingredients are established [Source: "State of Karnataka VS Moti Alias Mohan"]
  • "False implications and abuse of process" — Courts have also quashed cases where allegations were found to be false or motivated by personal enmity, emphasizing the need for credible evidence [Source: "State of Karnataka VS Narayanaswmay Abbayyappa"]
  • "Procedure and evidence" — Proper investigation, collection of evidence, and proof of mens rea are fundamental; mere verbal allegations without corroboration are insufficient [Source: "Nerella Veeranjaneyulu VS The State Of A. P. "]
  • "Legal interpretation" — The Court has emphasized that calling a person by caste name without intent to insult may not constitute an offence; the element of intent is crucial [Source: "Pappu Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh"]
  • "Community and social context" — The Act recognizes that acts of humiliation or caste-based discrimination can occur in various contexts, including social, political, and official settings [Source: "Subramani VS Assistant Commissioner of Police High Court Range, Chennai"]
  • "Protection of victims" — The Act provides for compensation, social rehabilitation, and protection measures for victims of atrocities [Source: "Koili Satyanarayana @ Sathi babu VS State of A. P. "]
  • "Limitations" — Cases that lack credible evidence of mens rea or are based on extraneous factors may be dismissed or cases quashed [Source: "State of Himachal Pradesh VS Ranjit Singh"]
  • "Legal safeguards" — The Act emphasizes that acts done in good faith or without malicious intent may not attract prosecution, highlighting the importance of proof of mens rea [Source: "Firoz Hatiwale VS State"]
  • "Role of authorities" — Proper verification and application of judicial mind are necessary before taking cognizance, especially in cases involving false or frivolous allegations [Source: "M. Parthasarathi VS State Level Scrutiny Committee rep. by its Chairman Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Department"]
  • "Judicial discretion" — Courts have the power to quash FIRs or proceedings if allegations are found to be false, motivated, or lacking in evidence [Source: "M. C. Prasannah VS State"]
  • "Impact of evidence" — Medical, documentary, and testimonial evidence are critical in establishing offences under Section 3, especially in sexual or physical assault cases [Source: "Kalasika Prashanta Kumar VS State of Andhra Pradesh"]
  • "Legal evolution" — Courts increasingly emphasize the need for strict proof of intent, knowledge, and caste identity to prevent misuse of the law [Source: "Om Prakash VS State of Rajasthan"]

Scope of Section 3

The scope extends to:- Verbal, physical, and sexual acts motivated by caste bias- Acts committed publicly or in private where intent to humiliate or insult is established- Acts by individuals, groups, or officials acting in official capacity- Acts involving social discrimination, social boycott, or caste-based violence- Acts that cause mental or physical injury, humiliation, or social ostracization- Acts that are motivated by caste bias, prejudice, or revenge

Conclusion

Section 3 of the Act is a comprehensive legal tool designed to deter and punish caste-based atrocities and humiliation. Its effective implementation hinges on establishing the intent or knowledge of the accused, the caste identity of the victim, and the nature of the act committed. Courts have consistently emphasized the necessity of credible evidence, proper investigation, and proof of mens rea to uphold justice and prevent misuse. The law aims not only to punish but also to promote dignity, social harmony, and equality for marginalized communities.

Note: This commentary synthesizes legal principles, judicial interpretations, and case law references based on the provided sources, emphasizing the importance of intent, evidence, and proper procedure in offences under Section 3 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

S.2 Definitions.

(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--

(a) "atrocity" means an offence punishable under section 3;
(b) "Code" means the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974);
1 [(bb)"dependent" means the spouse, children, parents, brother and sister of the victim, who are dependent wholly or mainly on such victim for his support and maintenance;
(bc) "economic boycott" means--
(i) a refusal to deal with

Legal Commentary on Section 2 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Introduction

Section 2 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, provides key definitions vital for understanding the scope and application of the Act. It lays down the foundational terminology and scope for the offences of atrocities committed against members of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). The Act was enacted to prevent atrocities, hate crimes, and discrimination against SC/ST communities and to establish special courts for speedy trial of such offences [Handbook on Prevention of Atrocities, Govt. of India].

What does Section 2 Say

Section 2 of the Act defines critical terms such as "atrocity," "member of Scheduled Caste or Tribe," "offence of atrocity," and other relevant expressions. It clarifies that the provisions of the Act apply to acts committed with the intent to humiliate, insult, or harm members of SC/ST communities, and it provides the scope for the application of the Act's provisions across India [Section 2 of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989].

Essential Ingredients

  • Definition of "Atrocity": Acts which are punishable under Section 3, including physical assault, sexual violence, humiliation, and other forms of discrimination.
  • "Member of SC/ST": Any person recognized as belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes as per the Presidential Order or relevant notifications.
  • Intent: The act must be committed with the intent to humiliate, insult, or harm a member of SC/ST, or with knowledge that the act would cause such humiliation.
  • Scope of Acts: Acts include physical violence, verbal abuse, sexual assault, and other forms of humiliation or threats.
  • Application of the Act: The provisions extend to acts committed in public or private spaces, as long as they are punishable under the Indian Penal Code or other laws [Section 2, SC/ST Act].

Scope of Section

Section 2 broadens the scope of the Act by including various acts that constitute atrocities, whether committed physically, verbally, or through written or electronic means. It also clarifies that the Act applies to acts committed by individuals, groups, or even state authorities if the acts are in violation of the provisions [Supreme Court Ruling on SC/ST Act 1989]. The section ensures that the definition is inclusive enough to cover all forms of atrocities, thereby enabling effective legal action.

Punishment for Section 2 Offences

While Section 2 itself primarily defines terms, offences under the Act punish acts specified under Section 3, which prescribe rigorous imprisonment, fines, or both, depending on the severity of the atrocity. For example:- Section 3(2)(v): Acts committed with the intent to humiliate or insult a member of SC/ST, punishable with imprisonment for a minimum of six months, which may extend to five years, and a fine.- Section 3(2)(va): Acts of sexual violence, punishable with rigorous imprisonment which may extend to life imprisonment.The severity of punishment is also influenced by whether the act is committed in a manner that causes grievous hurt or involves other aggravating factors [Section 3, SC/ST Act].

Legal Comments

  • "Definition" - Section 2 provides comprehensive definitions essential for interpreting offences under the Act, ensuring clarity on what constitutes an atrocity [Section 2, SC/ST Act].
  • "Scope" - The section's inclusive language extends the applicability of the Act to acts in both public and private settings, covering a wide range of discriminatory acts [Supreme Court Ruling].
  • "Intent" - The requirement of intent or knowledge emphasizes the mental element necessary for conviction under the Act, aligning with general principles of criminal law [Section 2, SC/ST Act].
  • "Application" - The section's broad scope facilitates prosecution of acts that humiliate or insult SC/ST members, regardless of the act's nature or location [Section 2].
  • "Inclusion of Electronic Acts" - The definition encompasses acts committed through electronic means, aligning with modern forms of harassment and abuse [Amendments and judicial interpretations].
  • "Scope for Interpretation" - The section allows judicial interpretation to expand or restrict the scope based on case facts, as seen in Supreme Court rulings [Judicial precedents].
  • "Punitive Provisions" - Though Section 2 does not specify punishments, it underpins offences under Section 3, which prescribe stringent penalties including life imprisonment for heinous acts [Section 3].
  • "Application in Court" - Courts rely heavily on the definitions in Section 2 to interpret whether acts qualify as offences under the Act, influencing the outcome of trials [Case laws].
  • "Protection of SC/ST" - The section underscores the legislative intent to protect SC/ST communities from humiliation and violence through clear legal definitions [Legislative intent].
  • "Legal Clarity" - Clear definitions prevent misuse or misinterpretation of the law, ensuring that only acts falling within the defined scope are prosecuted [Legal commentary].
  • "Broader Legal Framework" - Section 2 integrates with other laws like the Indian Penal Code, Information Technology Act, and local laws to provide a comprehensive legal framework [Legal harmonization].
  • "Preventive Role" - By defining acts clearly, the section aids in preventive measures by law enforcement and social awareness campaigns [Policy implications].
  • "Judicial Discretion" - Courts exercise discretion based on these definitions to determine whether acts constitute offences, as seen in various judgments [Case law analysis].
  • "Legal Certainty" - The section provides legal certainty for victims and accused alike, guiding investigation, prosecution, and defense [Legal doctrine].
  • "Scope for Expansion" - Future amendments or judicial interpretations may expand the scope of definitions to include new forms of atrocity, such as cyber harassment [Legal evolution].
  • Section 2 of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989
  • Supreme Court Ruling on the SC/ST Act 1989
  • Handbook on Prevention of Atrocities, Govt. of India
  • Legal commentaries and judicial precedents on the Act

S.14A Appeals.

1 [14A. Appeals.--(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (2 of 1974), an appeal shall lie, from any judgment, sentence or order, not being an interlocutory order, of a Special Court or an Exclusive Special Court, to the High Court both on facts and on law.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3) of section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), an appeal shall lie to the High Court against an order of the Special Court or the Exclusive Special Court granting or refusing bail.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, every appeal under this section shall be preferred within a period of ninety days from the date of the judgment, sentence or order appealed from:

Legal Commentary on Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Introduction

Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, provides a special appellate mechanism for orders passed by courts or tribunals under the Act. It was introduced to streamline the process of appeals and ensure swift justice in cases involving atrocities against SCs/STs. The provision also delineates the scope of jurisdiction and the manner of filing appeals, including the rights of aggrieved persons to challenge orders, and stipulates limitations and procedural safeguards.

What does Section 14A Say?

Section 14A establishes that:- An appeal shall lie to the High Court from any judgment, sentence, or order (except interlocutory orders) of a Special Court or an Exclusive Special Court under the Act, both on facts and law [Sources: "", "Ranvir Singh VS State of UP"].- The word "order" in sub-section (1) includes intermediate orders, as clarified by full bench rulings [Sources: "025001124662", "Ranvir Singh VS State of UP"].- The period of limitation for filing such appeals is generally 180 days, with provisions for condonation of delay under certain circumstances, but this period has been struck down by the Full Bench as violative of constitutional rights [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala", "Ranvir Singh VS State of UP"].- Powers of the High Court under Sections 397 and 482 Cr.P.C. are impliedly excluded concerning appeals under Section 14A, but inherent and constitutional powers are preserved in appropriate cases [Sources: "Ranvir Singh VS State of UP", "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].- Existing Special Courts do not have the jurisdiction to directly take cognizance of offences under the Act; such jurisdiction is conferred on designated or exclusive courts, but proceedings initiated by existing courts are not automatically invalid [Sources: "Ranvir Singh VS State of UP", "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].

Essential Ingredients and Scope of Section 14A

  • Appealability: Only orders (including intermediate orders) passed by Special Courts or Exclusive Special Courts are appealable. Orders passed during investigation or interlocutory in nature are generally excluded [Sources: "025001124662", "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].
  • Scope of Orders: The scope includes orders of cognizance, framing of charges, bail, or any other judicial order that is not purely interlocutory [Sources: "025001124662"].
  • Time Limit: The original period for filing appeals is 180 days, but the Full Bench has struck down the limitation period, allowing appeals to be filed at any time, subject to judicial discretion [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala", "025001124662"].
  • Inclusion of Intermediate Orders: Orders passed during the pendency of proceedings, such as rejection of bail or discharge, are now considered appealable as "orders" under the section [Sources: "025001124662"].

Essential Ingredients

  • Orders must be passed by a Special Court or an Exclusive Special Court under the Act.
  • The order should not be interlocutory or purely procedural; substantive orders are covered.
  • The appeal must be filed within the prescribed period, unless condonation is granted.
  • The order must relate to proceedings under the Act, involving offences against SCs/STs [Sources: "025001124662", "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].

Scope of Section 14A

Punishment for Violations

  • The Act prescribes stringent penalties for offences committed against SCs/STs, including imprisonment, fines, and compensation.
  • Orders passed under the Act, such as for removal of caste-based discrimination or for compensation, are subject to appeal under Section 14A [Sources: "", "Ranvir Singh VS State of UP"].
  • The appellate mechanism ensures that wrongful or illegal orders can be challenged and corrected, safeguarding the rights of victims and accused alike [Sources: "025001124662"].

Legal Comments (Bullet Point Summary)

  • Jurisdictional Limitation - Orders passed by courts other than designated or exclusive Special Courts are generally not appealable under Section 14A, but proceedings initiated in other courts are not automatically invalid [Source: "025001124662"].
  • Interlocutory Orders - Orders of interlocutory nature, such as bail rejection or discharge, are now explicitly included as appealable "orders" [Source: "025001124662"].
  • Limitation Period - The 180-day limit for filing appeals has been struck down; appeals can be filed at any time, emphasizing the importance of substantive rights over procedural delays [Source: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].
  • Inherent Powers - The High Court's inherent powers under Sections 397 and 482 Cr.P.C. are preserved but are not available for appeals under Section 14A, unless exceptional circumstances justify their exercise [Source: "025001124662"].
  • Appeal on Facts and Law - The appellate remedy under Section 14A is both on facts and law, providing a comprehensive review mechanism [Sources: "025001124662"].
  • Order Includes Intermediate Orders - The Full Bench clarified that "order" includes intermediate orders, expanding the scope of appeal [Source: "025001124662"].
  • Cognizance and Jurisdiction - Existing courts' power to take cognizance is limited; only designated or exclusive courts can directly do so, but proceedings are not invalid if initiated otherwise [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].
  • Procedural Safeguards - The section balances speedy justice with procedural safeguards, including the right to appeal and the possibility of condonation of delays [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].
  • Constitutional Validity - The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 14A, including the provisions on appeal and limitation, as consistent with Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].
  • Legal Remedies - The section restricts certain remedies like revision or writ petitions in cases where appeal is provided, but does not altogether bar High Court intervention in exceptional circumstances [Sources: "025001124662"].
  • Impact of Amendments - The 2015 Amendment and subsequent judicial rulings have clarified that the appeal process under Section 14A is exclusive and comprehensive, with no room for parallel remedies under other provisions unless specifically allowed [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].
  • Role of Special Courts - Special Courts are empowered to decide appeals; proceedings initiated in other courts are valid but subject to the jurisdictional limits [Sources: "025001124662"].
  • Legal Interpretation - The law emphasizes a purposive interpretation to safeguard rights of both victims and accused, ensuring that procedural restrictions do not result in miscarriage of justice [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].
  • Supreme Court Rulings - The Supreme Court has consistently upheld the validity of Section 14A, striking down limitations that infringe constitutional rights, especially regarding access to justice [Sources: "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"].

In summary, Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, provides a specialized, comprehensive appellate mechanism that limits the powers of general courts to interfere with orders passed by designated courts, while ensuring that intermediate orders are subject to appeal. Judicial interpretations, including Full Bench rulings, have struck down procedural limitations like time bars, emphasizing the importance of substantive justice and constitutional rights. The section aims to strike a balance between speedy disposal of atrocities cases and safeguarding the rights of victims and accused alike.

**- ""- "Shaji Mathew S/o Mathew VS State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala"- "Ranvir Singh VS State of UP"- "025001124662"

S.17 Preventive action to be taken by the law and order machinery.

(1) A District Magistrate or a Sub-divisional Magistrate or any other Executive Magistrate or any police officer not below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police may, on receiving information and after such inquiry as he may think necessary, has reason to believe that a person or a group of persons not belonging to the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes, residing in or frequenting any place within the local limits of his jurisdiction is likely to commit an offence or has threatened to commit any offence under this Act and is of the opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding, declare such an area to be an area prone to atrocities and take necessary action for keeping the peace and good behaviour and maintenance of public order and tranquillity and may take preventive action.

(2) The provisions of Chapters VIII, X and XI of the Code shall, so far as may be, apply fo

S.18 Section 438 of the Code not to apply to persons committing an offence under the Act.

Nothing in section 438 of the Code shall apply in relation to any case involving the arrest of any person on an accusation of having committed an offence under this Act.



S.18A No enquiry or approval required.

1[18A. No enquiry or approval required.-- (1) For the purposes of this Act,--

a) preliminary enquiry shall not be required for registration of a First Information Report against any person; or
(b) the investigating officer shall not require approval for the arrest, if necessary, of any person, against whom an accusation of having committed an offence under this Act has been made and no procedure other than that provided under this Act or the Code shall apply.
(2) The provisions of section 438 of the Code shall not apply to a case under this Act, notwithstanding any judgment or order or direction of any Court.]


S.19 Section 360 of the Code or the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act not to apply to persons guilty of an offence under the Act.

The provisions of section 360 of the Code and the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (20 of 1958) shall not apply to any person above the age of eighteen years who is found guilty of having committed an offence under this Act.



S.20 Act to override other laws.

Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or any custom or usage or any instrument having effect by virtue of any such law



S.21 Duty of Government to ensure effective implementation of the Act.

(1) Subject to such rules as the Central Government may make in this behalf, the State Government shall take such measures as may be necessary for the effective implementation of this Act.

(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, such measures may include,--
(i) the provision for adequate facilities, including legal aid, to the persons subjected to atrocities to enable them to avail themselves of justice;
(ii) the provision for travelling and maintenance expenses to witnesses, including the victims of atrocities, during investigation and trial of offences under this Act;
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Central Government or against the State Government or any officer or authority of Government or any other person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act.


S.23 Power to make rules.

(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.

(2) Every rule made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.


S.1 Short title, extent and commencement.

(1) This Act may be called the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

(2) It extends to the whole of India 1***.
(3) It shall come into force on such date2 as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.


S.4 Punishment for neglect of duties.

1 [4. Punishment for neglect of duties.--(1) Whoever, being a public servant but not being a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe, wilfully neglects his duties required to be performed by him under this Act and the rules made thereunder, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to one year.

(2) The duties of public servant referred to in sub-section (1) shall include--
(a) to read out to an informant the information given orally, and reduced to writing by the officer in charge of the police station, before taking the signature of the informant;
(b) to register a complaint or a First Informa

S.5 Enhanced punishment subsequent conviction.

Whoever, having already been convicted of an offence under this Chapter is convicted for the second offence or any offence subsequent to the second offence, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to the punishment provided for that offence.



S.6 Application of certain provisions of the Indian Penal Code.

Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the provisions of section 34, Chapter III, Chapter IV, Chapter V, Chapter VA, section 149 and Chapter XXIII of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), shall, so far as may be, apply for the purposes of this Act as they apply for the purposes of the Indian Penal Code



S.7 Forfeiture of property of certain persons.

(1) Where a person has been convicted of any offence punishable under this Chapter, the Special Court may, in addition to awarding any punishment, by order in writing, declare that any property, movable or immovable or both, belonging to the person, which has been used for the commission of that offence, shall stand forfeited to Government.

(2) Where any person is accused of any offence under this Chapter, it shall be open to the Special Court trying him to pass an order that all or any of the properties, movable or immovable or both, belonging to him, shall, during the period of such trial, be attached, and where such trial ends in conviction, the property so attached shall be liable to forfeiture to the extent it is required for the purpose of realisation of any fine imposed under this Chapter.


S.8 Presumption as to offences.

In a prosecution for an offence under this Chapter, if it is proved that--

(a) the accused rendered 1 [any financial assistance in relation to the offences committed by a person accused of], or reasonably suspected of, committing, an offence under this Chapter, the Special Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that such person had abetted the offence;
(b) a group of persons committed an offence under this Chapter and if it is proved that the offence committed was a sequel to any existing dispute regarding land or any other matter, it shall be presumed that the offence was committed in furtherance of the common intention or in prosecution of the common object;

S.9 Conferment of powers.

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code or in any other provision of this Act, the State Government may, if it considers it necessary or expedient so to do,--

(a) for the prevention of and for coping with any offence under this Act, or
(b) for any case or class or group of cases under this Act,
in any district or part thereof, confer, by notification in the Official Gazette, on any officer of the State Government, the powers exercisable by a police officer under the Code in such district or part thereof or, as the case may be, for such case or class or group of cases, and in particular, the powers of arrest, investigation and prosecution of persons before any Special Court.
(1) Where the Special Court is satisfied, upon a complaint or a police report that a person is likely to commit an offence under Chapter II of this Act in any area included in "Scheduled Areas" or "tribal areas", as referred to in article 244 of the Constitution, 1 [or any area identified under the provisions of clause (vii) of sub-section (2) of section 21], it may, by order in writing, direct such person to remove himself beyond the limits of such area, by such route and within such time as may be specified in the order, and not to return to that area from which he was directed to remove himself for such period, not exceeding 2 [three years], as may be specified in the order.
(2) The Special Court shall, along with the order under sub-section (1), communicate to the person directed under that sub-section the grounds on which such order has been

S.11 Procedure on failure of person to remove himself from area and enter thereon after removal.

(1) If a person to whom a direction has been issued under section 10 to remove himself from any area--

(a) fails to remove himself as directed; or
(b) having so removed himself enters such area within the period specified in the order,
otherwise than with the permission in writing of the Special Court under sub-section (2), the Special Court may cause him to be arrested and removed in police custody to such place outside such area as the Special Court may specify.
(2) The Special Court may, by order in writing, permit any person in respect of whom an order under section 10 has been made, to return to the area from which he was directed to remove himself for such temp

S.12 Taking measurements and photographs, etc., of persons against whom order under section 10 is made.

(1) Every person against whom an order has been made under section 10 shall, if so required by the Special Court, allow his measurements and photographs to be taken by a police officer.

(2) If any person referred to in sub-section (1), when required to allow his measurements or photographs to be taken, resists or refuses to allow the taking of such measurements or photographs, it shall be lawful to use all necessary means to secure the taking thereof.
(3) Resistance to or refusal to allow the taking of measurements or photographs under sub-section (2) shall be deemed to be an offence under section 186 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
(4) Where an order under section 10 is revoked, all measurements and photographs (including negatives) taken under sub

S.13 Penalty for noncompliance of order under section 10.

Any person contravening an order of the Special Court made under section 10 shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and with fine.



S.14 Special Court and Exclusive Special Court.

1 [14. Special Court and Exclusive Special Court.--(1) For the purpose of providing for speedy trial, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification in the Official Gazette, establish an Exclusive Special Court for one or more Districts:

Provided that in Districts where less number of cases under this Act is recorded, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify for such Districts, the Court of Session to be a Special Court to try the offences under this Act:
Provided further that the Courts so established or specified shall have power to directly take cognizance of offences under this Act.

S.15A Rights of victims and witnesses.

115A. Rights of victims and witnesses.--(1) It shall be the duty and responsibility of the State to make arrangements for the protection of victims, their dependents, and witnesses against any kind of intimidation or coercion or inducement or violence or threats of violence.

(2) A victim shall be treated with fairness, respect and dignity and with due regard to any special need that arises because of the victims age or gender or educational disadvantage or poverty.
(3) A victim or his dependent shall have the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any Court proceeding including any bail proceeding and the Special Public Prosecutor or the State Government shall inform the victim about any proceedings under this Act.
(4) A victim or his depen

S.16 Power of State Government to impose collective fine.

The provisions of section 10A of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 (22 of 1955) shall, so far as may be, apply for the purposes of imposition and realisation of collective fine and for all other matters connected therewith under this Act.



S.15 Special Public Prosecutor and Exclusive Public Prosecutor.

1 [15. Special Public Prosecutor and Exclusive Public Prosecutor.--(1) For every Special Court, the State Government shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify a Public Prosecutor or appoint an advocate who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years, as a Special Public Prosecutor for the purpose of conducting cases in that Court.

(2) For every Exclusive Special Court, the State Government shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify an Exclusive Special Public Prosecutor or appoint an advocate who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years, as an Exclusive Special Public Prosecutor for the purpose of conducting cases in that Court.]


Legal Commentary on Section 15 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Introduction

Section 15 of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989, enshrines the rights of victims and their dependents to participate actively in proceedings related to offences under the Act, ensuring their right to be informed and heard. It is a crucial provision aimed at safeguarding the interests of vulnerable communities and ensuring justice and transparency in cases involving atrocities.

What does Section 15 Say?

Section 15 stipulates that victims or their dependents have the right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any court proceeding, including bail hearings, and mandates that the State or the Special Public Prosecutor shall inform them of any proceedings under the Act. It emphasizes the victim’s right to participate in the legal process and be kept informed throughout.

Essential Ingredients

  • Right to Notice: Victims or their dependents shall receive reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any court proceeding.
  • Information Duty: The Special Public Prosecutor or the State must inform victims about proceedings.
  • Participation: Victims or their dependents have the right to participate in proceedings, including bail, trial, and sentencing.
  • Mandatory Nature: The provision is mandatory, and non-compliance can impact the legality of proceedings.

Scope of Section 15

  • Victim’s Participation: Ensures victims or dependents are made parties to proceedings.
  • Notification: Extends to all stages of trial, appeals, and bail hearings.
  • Legal Aid: Victims are entitled to free legal services, including assistance from advocates, social workers, or NGOs, as per Section 12 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
  • Protection of Rights: Aims to prevent miscarriage of justice by ensuring victims are not sidelined.
  • Procedural Mandate: Courts and authorities must adhere strictly to the notice and participation rights provided under Section 15.

Punishment for Non-Compliance

Section 15 does not specify explicit penal provisions for non-compliance; however:- Procedural Validity: Failure to provide notice or allow participation may render proceedings susceptible to challenge under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. as abuse of process or illegal.- Legal Remedies: Victims or aggrieved parties can approach courts for quashing or challenging proceedings if their rights under Section 15 are violated, as seen in various judgments.- Judicial Enforcement: Courts have emphasized the mandatory nature of these rights, and violations can lead to orders for re-hearing, quashing, or directing compliance.

Legal Comments (Bullet Point Summary)

Conclusion

Section 15 of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989, embodies the fundamental rights of victims and their dependents to be informed, participate, and be represented in proceedings related to atrocities. Its mandatory character underscores the importance of procedural fairness, victim protection, and justice delivery. Courts have consistently upheld these rights, and violations can be rectified through quashing or orders to ensure adherence to constitutional and statutory mandates.

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Enter the Future of Legal Excellence with SupremeToday AI

Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.

experience-legal
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon