SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52257

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, J
DR. USHA V. PARAMESWARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO.20658 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.RAVINDRAN (SR.), LAKSHMI RAMADAS, APARNA RAJAN, SREEDHAR RAVINDRAN, M.R.SABU
For the Respondents: ASOK M.CHERIAN, N.SATHEESH, T.C.KRISHNA, JAMES ABRAHAM (VILAYAKATTU), ISAAC KURUVILLA ILLIKAL, K.JAJU BABU (SR.), SRI.T.S.SHYAMPRASANTH

State legislation can prescribe higher qualifications for educational positions without violating UGC regulations, as such requirements do not constitute repugnancy but enhance academic standards.

Headnote:(A) Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies Act, 2010 - Section 45A - Constitutional validity challenged regarding the qualifications for Assistant Professors at the University - Petitioners argue the qualifications conflict with University Grants Commission regulations - Section 45A's stipulations held valid as not repugnant to the UGC regulations, which only set minimum qualifications. (Paras 1, 7, 12, 17)

(B) Education Law - The State's authority to prescribe higher qualifications for teaching positions does not violate existing UGC regulations - The court affirms precedence of UGC Regulations regarding qualifications while allowing States to set higher benchmarks for educational quality. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, aspirants for assistant professorship positions at the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, challenge the qualifications stipulated under Section 45A of the KUFOS Act, asserting conflicts with UGC regulations. (Paras 1, 5)

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that Section 45A's educational requirements do not contradict UGC mandates and serve to enhance educational standards, maintaining that such qualifications are permissible. (Paras 10, 14)

Issues: Whether the qualifications prescribed under Section 45A are in conflict with UGC regulations and whether they are reasonable. (Paras 3, 5)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found no conflict between Section 45A and UGC regulations, emphasizing the legitimacy of the State's right to mandate higher qualifications for teaching positions without infringing upon UGC standards. (Paras 11, 17)

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to qualification criteria. (Para 1)
2. court's analysis on legal frameworks. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 16)
3. arguments on ugc and kufos qualifications. (Para 5 , 7 , 9 , 15)
4. state power to set qualifications. (Para 11 , 12)
5. writ petition dismissed. (Para 17)

JUDGMENT

The petitioners are aspirants to the posts of Assistant Professors in the second respondent University. In this writ petition, they challenge the constitutional validity of Section 45A of the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies Act, 2010 (hereinafter, referred to as the KUFOS Act) in so far as it relates to the prescription of qualification for teaching posts, and also the notification issued by the University for filling up of teaching posts with such prescription.

2. I have heard Sri.P.Ravindran, the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1, 2 and 3, Sri.T.C.Krishna, the learned counsel for the 4th respondent, Sri.James Abraham (Vilayakattu), the learned counsel for additional respondents 5 to 15, Sri.Isaac Kuruvilla Illikal, the learned counsel for additional respondent No.16 and Sri.Jaju Babu, the learned Senior Counsel for the University.

3. KUFOS Act, 2010 was amended by Act 18 of 2021 incorporating Section 45A . The writ petition was filed prior to the passing of the Act and when the amendment ordinance was promulgated.

4. Pending the writ petition, the Act came into force, and consequential amendments were made in the writ petition.

5. Section 45A of the KUFOS Act reads thus:-

“45A. University Teachers -

(1) Each Faculty shall have teachers in the categories of Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professor distinctly: Provided that a teacher from one faculty may be allowed to teach in another faculty as required.

(2) Of the teaching posts of the Faculty of Fisheries transferred from the University of Agriculture, the departments except Fisheries Engineering, Management and Fisheries Hydrography shall be retained in the faculty of Fisheries of this University.

(3) The appointment, powers and duties of the teaching posts shall be as prescribed by the statutes. But the teachers in the Fisheries Faculty shall have degree in Fisheries Science approved by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, postgraduate degree in the Fisheries subject concerned and other qualifications as mandated by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research: Provided that the degree in Fisheries Science is not mandatory for those who are continuing, as on the date of commencement of the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (Amendment) Act, 2021, in the teaching post in the Faculty of Fisheries in the University.

(4) Teacher shall be responsible to the Head of the Department for the activities of the teaching, research and extension programs entrusted to him.”

Sub-section (3) thereof contains the prescription of qualification, which is under challenge in this writ petition. As per sub-section (3), the teachers in the fisheries faculty shall have degree in Fisheries Science approved by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Postgraduate degree in the Fisheries subject concerned and other qualifications as mandated by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Challenge against the said prescription of qualification is on two grounds:-

(i) The qualification prescribed is repugnant to the qualification prescribed under the University Grants Commission (for short, UGC) regulations.

(ii) The qualification prescribed is irrational and unreasonable.

6. Ext.P1 is the “UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018”. That the second respondent University is bound by Ext.P1 UGC Regulations, is not in dispute.

7. Regulation 4.1 – I (A)(i) of Ext.P1 prescribes the qualification for Assistant Professor. The said r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top