IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
M.S.Sunish – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Malabar Devaswom Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for protection of temple assets. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's duty to protect devaswom properties. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. rights and protections of properties under devaswom management. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's directive for survey and resolution of encroachment. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner, who is stated to be the President of Kamba Parambu Mojana Committee, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 5 to ensure that the assets of Mele Thrikovil Sreeramaswamy Temple and Sree Vayilyam Kunnu Bhagavathy Temple, which are controlled institutions under the Malabar Devaswom Board, are protected by constructing a compound wall and removing the encroachment made by the 6th respondent. The further reliefs sought for is a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 5 to ensure that the temple ground is not used to park the vehicles brought for repair at the nearby workshop and also to ensure that the temple premises are not used for the sale of banned substance and for conduct of liquor parties; a writ of mandamus commandi
Prayar Gopalakrishnan and another v. State of Kerala and others
A.A. Gopalakrishnan v. Cochin Devaswom Board
Travancore Devaswom Board v. Mohanan Nair
Achuthan Pillai v. State of Kerala
Nandakumar v. District Collector and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.