ORDER

The above review petition is filed seeking a review of the judgment dated 19.04.2024 in WP(C) No.10099 of 2024. 2.The main contention raised by the review petitioner is that she was not made a party in the writ proceedings eventhough the subject matter of the writ petition is regarding an attachment made by the Family Court in the original petition filed by the review petitioner, and the prayer in the writ petition was to release the above said attachment. The review petitioner would submit that the writ petition is filed without impleading her, and therefore the judgment under review has been passed without appreciating the entire facts of the case.

3.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the review petitioner, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Bank and the learned Government Pleader.

4.This Court disposed of the writ petition on the basis of the declaration of law in Madhan S. v. Sub Registrar, Kollam and Others [ 2014 (1) KHC 249 ] and the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Secretary, Keechery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Sajitha Nizar @ Sajitha P.M. and Others [ 2020 (5) KHC 231 ] and the decision in Ali Asharaf M.M. and Another v. Sub Regi