Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAJAHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner is the accused (Para 3) |
| 2. heard counsel for the petitioner (Para 5) |
| 3. it is true that there (Para 8) |
| 4. moreover, it is a well accepted (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. considering the dictum laid down (Para 12) |
COMMON ORDER
This Bail Application is filed under Section Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ).
2. These two cases are connected and I am disposing these two cases by a common order.
3. Petitioner is the accused in Crime Nos.77/2024 and 111/2024 of Kasargod Excise Range. These cases are registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 58 and 55(i) of the Abkari Act.
4. The prosecution case is that the petitioner was found in possession of Indian Made Foreign Liquor. The allegation in Crime No.77/2024 is that, the petitioner was found in possession of 17.28 litres of Indian made Foreign Liquor and in Crime No.111/2024 is that the petitioner was 4 found in possession of 64.08 litres of Indian made Foreign Liquor. Petitioner was arrested in Crime No.111/2024 on 18.11.2024 and the arrest was recorded in Crime No.77/2024 on 16.11.2024.
5. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.
6. The counsel for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
