Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
K. Rajendran Nair – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to e-tender notification validity (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. authority of the board to regulate supplies. (Para 6 , 28 , 34) |
| 3. regulatory measures to ensure compliance. (Para 7 , 10 , 15) |
| 4. importance of safety during the pilgrimage. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. prohibition on unauthorized supply in high-security zones. (Para 31) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
W.P.(C)Nos.29371 of 2023 and 29762 of 2023:-
The issue raised in these writ petitions relates to Kuthaka items 84A and 84B in the e-tender notification dated 23.08.2023 issued by the 4th respondent Executive Officer, Sabarimala. The petitioners in these writ petitions, some of whom were successful bidders who conducted hotels in Sabarimala Sannidhanam and Pamba during previous Mandala Makaravilakku festival seasons, have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a declaration that Kuthaka items 84A and 84B in the e-tender notification dated 23.08.2023 issued by the Executive Officer, Sabarimala is void and inoperative; a writ of mandamus commanding the Travancore Devaswom Board not to enter into any agreements in respect of Kuthaka items 84A and 84B in the e- tender notification dat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
