HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Farjand Ali, J.
Suresh Kumar Ojhwani Son Of Shri Bhanwar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1599 of 2022
Decided On : 23-02-2022
FIR Challenge - Jurisdiction of Court - The court declined to quash the FIR but directed the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police, instructing fair and impartial investigation, and ensuring no arrest until the representation is considered.
Fact of the Case:
The petition challenged the lodging of FIR No.61/2022 for offence under Sections 354 IPC at Police Station Christianganj, Ajmer.
Finding of the Court:
The court declined to quash the FIR, directed the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police, and instructed fair and impartial investigation, ensuring no arrest until the representation is considered.
Issues: Challenge to lodging of FIR, Jurisdiction of Court, Fair Investigation, Arrest Procedure
Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised extraordinary powers to direct submission of a detailed representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police, ensuring fair and impartial investigation and no arrest until the representation is considered.
Final Decision: The criminal misc. petition is disposed of, and the stay application stands disposed of.
ORDER
1. By way of filing the instant miscellaneous petition, challenge has been made to the very lodging of the FIR No.61/2022 registered at Police Station Christianganj, Ajmer for offence under Sections 354 IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. Gone through the contents of the FIR and the other material made available on record.
3. After going through the nature of allegations leveled in the FIR and the nature of the offence, this Court does not deem it appropriate to quash the FIR impugned and to hamper the course of investigation. However, looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the offence is exclusively triable by the Court of Magistrate or Section 41 of Cr.P.C. applies and looking to the applicability of the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr. [(2014) 8 SCC 273], while exercising the extraordinary powers available with this Court, I deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner/s to submit a detailed representation to the concerned Superintendent of Police averring therein all the grounds which have been raised in this petition within a period of 20 days from the date of receipt of this order.
4. In the event, the representation is submitted, the concerned Superintendent of Police is directed to consider the submissions/grounds raised in the representation, and instruct the concerned Investigating Officer to conduct fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in the matter.
5. The requisite endorsement shall be made in the case diary as to the consideration of the representation.
6. It is made clear that until the submissions of the accused- petitioners are not considered or the final result is not reached; the accused-petitioners shall not be arrested. If still thereafter it is decided that the arrest has become imperative; they would be given 15 days notice prior to affect the arrest.
7. It is directed to the officers to strictly follow the provisions of law and the judgment referred above, it should not be taken as a formality.
8. In the event, the grievance of the petitioner persists, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court again.
9. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of.
The stay application also stands disposed of.
Exercise of extraordinary powers by the court to ensure fair investigation and no arrest until submission of detailed representation.
The court ruled that an FIR cannot be quashed when ongoing investigations reveal potential offences, allowing petitioners to present their case to the Investigating Officer.
Petitioners allowed to raise objections before trial court at the stage of framing of charges.
The court reaffirmed the principle that defendants have the right to contest charges during the trial process rather than preemptively quashing an FIR.
The court allows petitioners to submit a representation to the Superintendent of Police and provides protection from arrest for 20 days, emphasizing the need for objective consideration of grievances....
The court can dispose of a petition seeking quashing of an FIR if the investigation reveals the dispute to be of civil nature and a negative final report is submitted.
The court established that criminal proceedings cannot be sustained when the underlying dispute is determined to be of a civil nature.
Granting protection from arrest and allowing custodial interrogation with notice if required based on the peculiar facts of the case.
An FIR cannot be quashed merely due to discrepancies in incident dates; the police's investigative role is paramount.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.