SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12132

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
V. G. Arun, J
ARUN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SANDEEP T.GEORGE

O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.102/2023 of Vattiyoorkavu Police Station registered for the offence punishable under Section 22(b) of the NDPS Act . The crime was registered on the allegation that, at 4.15 pm on 6/2/2023, 1.320 gm of MDMA was recovered from the petitioner's possession. The motor cycle in which the petitioner had reached the spot was also seized. Although the petitioner, moved a petition under Section 457 Cr.PC , seeking interim release of his vehicle, mobile phone, ATM Cards, Aadhar Card and purse, the Additional Sessions Court-1, Thiruvananthapuram allowed the prayer for the release of Purse, two ATM cards and digital watch and refused to release his vehicle and mobile phones. Aggrieved, this Crl.MC is filed.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that even going by the prosecution case, the contraband was seized from the petitioner's personal possession and hence the vehicle cannot be treated as a conveyance used for transporting the contraband. In support of this contention, reliance is placed on the decision inThausif Ahammed Bengre v. State of Kerala[ 2018(1) KHC 598 ]. It is contended that even in cases where the inventory of the v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top