IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G. ARUN, J.
Shanil, S/o. Ayyappan & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(Crl) Nos.1189 & 1241 of 2022, W.P.(Crl) Nos.29 & 83 of 2023, Crl.M.C.Nos.8820, 9193 & 9255 of 2022 and Crl.M.C.Nos.176, 271 & 323 of 2023
Decided On : 13-02-2023
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 451 or 457 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 36c, 51, 52A, 60(3) - Vehicle carrying contraband - Warrants, arrests - Procedure by police upon seizure of property - Whether vehicle is 'conveyance' used in transporting contraband or whether vehicle was put to such use, in spite of owner or agent having taken all precautions to prevent it - Accused were charged for offence of Section 27 alone, question of seizing vehicle terming it as a Conveyance' does not arise. (Para 2)
Finding of the Court :
Court refrain from delving into question whether seized vehicles could be termed as 'conveyance' used in carrying contraband, as it is for jurisdictional court to decide that aspect depending on facts of each case - As rightly pointed out by learned Public Prosecutor, complicity or otherwise of owner, stipulated in Section 60(3), is also an aspect which jurisdictional court can consider.
Result : Disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
The alarming proportion at which the menace of drugs was growing in our country compelled the Supreme Court to make the following observations in Union of India v Mohanlal and another [(2016) 3 SCC 379];
Going by the available statistics, the words of caution seem to have fallen on deaf ears. The menace has grown manifold in the past seven years and God's own country is vying for a predominant position among the States.
2. For the purpose of deciding the issue involved in these cases the focus has to be shifted to another aspect dealt with in Mohanlal (supra) viz; the procedure for seizure, sampling, safe keeping and disposal of narcotic drugs and psychotropic and controlled substances and conveyances in the light of Section 52A incorporated through an amendment in 2014. After detailed analysis, the following directions were issued in Mohanlal;
31.1. No sooner the seizure of any narcotic drugs and psychotropic and controlled substances and conveyances is effected, the same shall be forwarded to the officer in charge of the nearest police station or to the officer empowered under Section 53 of the Act. The officer concerned shall then approach the Magistrate with an application under Section 52-A(2) of the Act, which shall be allowed by the Magistrate as soon as may be required under sub-section (3) of Section 52-A, as discussed by us in the body of this judgment under the heading “seizure and sampling”. The sampling shall be done under the supervision of the Magistrate as discussed in Paras 15 to 19 of this order.
31.2. The Central Government and its agencies and so also the State Governments shall within six months from today take appropriate steps to set up storage facilities for the exclusive storage of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic and controlled substances and conveyances duly equipped with vaults and double-locking system to prevent theft, pilferage or replacement of the seized drugs. The Central Government and the State Governments shall also designate an officer each for their respective storage facility and provide for other steps, measures as stipulated in Standing Order No. 1 of 1989 to ensure proper security against theft, pilferage or replacement of the seized drugs.
31.3. The Central Government and the State Governments shall be free to set up a storage facility for each district in the States and depending upon the extent of seizure and store required, one storage facility for more than one districts.
31.4. Disposal of the seized drugs currently lying in the Police Malkhanas and other places used for storage shall be carried out by the DDCs concerned
Shajahan v. Inspector of Excise and others
Smart Logistics v. State of Kerala
Basavva Kom Dyamangouda Patil v. State of Mysore
SupremeToday
Point of Law : Section 27 extracted is Punishment for consumption of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the jurisdictional Special Court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 has the power to order interim custody of vehi....
Release of vehicle - In the absence of procedure evolved for release of vehicle also, the matter has to be considered by the Larger Bench. In the case on hand, the question involved is in respect of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the trial court has the discretion to grant interim custody of a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act under Section 451 of the Cr.P.C., and there....
Car owners, not charged in drug cases, may have vehicles returned unless shown knowledge or involvement in crimes.
A registered owner of a vehicle seized in connection with a narcotics offence, who is not an accused, is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle, subject to meeting certain conditions to ensure co....
A true vehicle owner not implicated in a narcotics crime is entitled to interim custody of their vehicle pending trial, emphasizing procedural fairness and rights under statutory law.
The court emphasized that the ownership of seized vehicles cannot be ignored and must be adjudicated by a Special Court to ensure fairness and justice.
Confiscation and release of vehicle – Decision regarding confiscation of any article can be taken only by Special Court and only after conviction, acquittal or discharge – There is no provision for p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.