SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 16012

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
B.K SHYAMALA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
RAGI RAJENDRAN – Respondent


Advocates:
M.R.SARIN

JUDGMENT

The original petition is filed to direct the Court of Munsiff -III, Neyyattinkara to expeditiously dispose of O.S. No.642/2021, within a time period to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner has averred in the original petition that, she has instituted the suit against the respondents for a decree of partition. Although the suit was instituted in September, 2021, the same has not been decided, which in turn is causing prejudice to the petitioner.

Hence, the original petition.

3. Heard; Sri. M.R.Sarin, the learned the counsel appearing for the petitioner, on admission.

4. The Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 lays down the procedure to be followed by civil courts right from the institution of the suit till the execution of the decree.

5. It is trite, the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to be exercised sparingly and in cases of exceptional rarity. The power under this Article casts a duty on this Court to keep Courts of the District Judicature and Tribunals within their bounds of authority and see that they discharge their functions as per the mandate prescribed under law. But, that does not mean that this Court is to int

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top