HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
M/S. HEDGE FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BIJISH JOSEPH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute resolution through arbitration. (Para 2 , 8) |
| 2. legal arguments on enforcing interim awards. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. ineligibility of arbitrators post-amendment. (Para 10 , 18) |
| 4. nullity of awards from ineligible arbitrators. (Para 21 , 23) |
| 5. reconsideration of case mandated. (Para 24 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by the order in CMA (Arb) No.530/2022 of the Court of Additional District Judge – VIII, Ernakulam, the petitioner before the court below has filed this original petition.
2. The skeletal facts relevant for the determination of the original petition are: the petitioner is a public limited company registered with the Reserve Bank of India as a non-banking finance company engaged in providing loans on a hypothecation and guarantee basis. The respondent and his guarantor had entered into Ext.P1 hypothecation agreement with the petitioner to purchase a motor car on hypothecation. It was, inter-alia, agreed by the parties that in the case of any dispute between them, the same would be settled in arbitration at Ernakulam. The respondent committed a breach of the agreement. The petitioner invoked Clause 20 of Ext.P1 agreement and issued a notice under Section 21 of the
Sundaram Finance Limited v. Abdul Samad and another
Muthoot Vehicle and Asset Finance Ltd. v. Gopalan Kuttappan
Voestalpine Schienen GmbH v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd
TRF Ltd v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd
Bharat Broadband Network Ltd v. United Telecoms Ltd
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC and another v. HSCC (India) Ltd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.