SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 59096

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
MARIYAM BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
PEEYUS A.KOTTAM

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 13th day of October, 2022 The petitioner, who is owner of 10.12 Ares of property in Thrikkariyoor Village of Kothamangalam Taluk in Ernakulam District, has filed this writ petition seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 application and to pass orders thereon, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that she is the owner in possession of 10.12 Ares of land comprised in Survey No.717/2-3 of Thrikkariyoor Village of Kothamangalam Taluk in Ernakulam District. The land is garden land. It is not cultivated with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation either. However, the land is described as paddy land in Revenue records.

3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other purposes. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P3 application in Form-6 before the Revenue Divisional Officer, invoking the provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008. The application was filed on

01.10.2022. The application has not been considered so far. Unless the application is considered expeditiously, the petitioner will be put to untold hardship and loss, contends the petitioner.

4. The Govern

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top