SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 17330

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
NACHIMUTHU – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, – Respondent
WP(C)/37661/2022



Advocates:
K.P.SHEREEF, NABIL KHADER, FARSEENA V.

Applications under Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules must be considered by the competent authority within a reasonable time.

Headnote:

Constitutional - Writ Petition - Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 - Rule 12(1)

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, owner of 7.79 Ares of land, sought a writ to direct the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider an application under Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 for changing the land's designation in records.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that as the application was filed in accordance with statutory provisions, the competent authority was mandated to consider it and issue orders within a reasonable timeframe.

Issues: Whether the Revenue Divisional Officer is obligated to consider the application filed under Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the petitioner’s application, being statutory, requires consideration by the competent authority as per the established rules.

Final Decision: The court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to process the application within two months.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2022 The petitioner, who is owner of 7.79 Ares of property in Block No.1 of Niramaruthur Village of Tirur Taluk in Malappuram District, has filed the writ petition seeking to direct the respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to consider Ext.P4 application and to pass orders thereon, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that he is owner in possession of 7.79 Ares of land comprised in Survey No.133/4-10 of Block No.1 of Niramaruthur Village of Tirur Taluk in Malappuram District. The land is garden land. It is not cultivated with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation either. However, the land is described as ‘Nilam’ in Revenue records.

3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other purposes. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 application in Form-6 before the Revenue Divisional Officer, invoking the provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 . The application was filed on 05.04.2022. The application has not been considered so far. Unless the application is considered expeditiously, the petitioner will be put to untold hardship and loss, contends the petitioner.

4. The Government Pleader representing the respondent resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader controverted all material allegations made by the petitioner, in the writ petition. The Government Pleader, however, submitted that since the petitioner has invoked a statutory remedy under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 , the application submitted by the petitioner can be considered by the competent authority in accordance with law, provided the application is received, is complete in all respects and is supported by all necessary documents.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing the respondent.

6. The property of the petitioner is said to be a dry land, but it has been described as paddy land in Revenue records. Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 provides for making applications for changing the nature of land in Revenue records. The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Rules, 2008 by filing application in Form-6. It being a statutory application, the Competent Authority is bound to consider the application and pass orders thereon within a reasonable time.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 Form-6 application, if the same is received supported by all requisite documents and paying prescribed fee, if any, and to pass orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of two months.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37661/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT NO.KLI 004150750 9/2021 DATED 17-11-

2021 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, NIRAMARUTHUR DATED 08-03-2022 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE SURVEY SKETCH OF THE ABOVE LAND PREPARED BY LICENCED SURVEYOR DATED 10-03-2022 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 PETITION NO.

27/2022/917158 DATED 05-04-2022 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, NIRAMARUTHUR ON 15-

06-2022.

RESPONDENT’S/S EXHIBITS : NIL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top